Clayface
← all movies. Each comment's label under every pathway (+ positive, − negative, 0 neutral / mixed / no verdict; hover a cell for the verdict).
Pick a pathway to show its verdict and rationale under every comment: VADER (old v1) · siebert+opinion (previous live) · Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large) · GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE) · Claude Opus 5.5 · Claude Sonnet 5.5 · Gemini 4 Argon · Grok 4.7 · GPT-6 Luna (cheap) · Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap) · Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap)
| comment (excerpt ≤280 chars) | VADER (old v1) | siebert+opinion (previous live) | Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large) | GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE) | Claude Opus 5.5 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Gemini 4 Argon | Grok 4.7 | GPT-6 Luna (cheap) | Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap) | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank · score · bucket · Reddit · comments +/0/− | #7 76 Depends R 72 57/15/28 | #6 73 Depends R 63 41/31/28 | #4 67 Depends R 50 15/65/20 | #6 88 Depends R 97 45/53/2 | #6 89 Depends R 99 47/52/1 | #6 89 Depends R 99 45/54/1 | #6 89 Depends R 99 46/53/1 | #6 88 Depends R 98 43/55/2 | #6 89 Depends R 99 46/53/1 | #6 88 Depends R 98 44/54/2 | #6 87 Depends R 96 48/48/4 |
| thread #0 w 1.0 The scene where Matt has the whole club doing a choreographed dance was fantastic, actually that whole night club scene was very well done. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.718 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.91 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.53 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Explicitly praises the choreographed dance and the entire nightclub scene as fantastic and well done. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises the nightclub dance scene as fantastic and very well done, with no criticism. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter praises the choreographed dance and nightclub scene as fantastic and very well done, indicating approval of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly praises a specific scene in the film as fantastic and very well done. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises the nightclub scene as fantastic and well done. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They clearly praise the nightclub scene as fantastic and well done. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter praises the nightclub dance scene as fantastic and very well done, a clear positive judgement of the film's execution. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises specific scenes as fantastic and very well done. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #1 w 0.707 The body horror bits were the highlight for me, specially when his face starts melting in the mirror and he keeps trying to reshape it with his hands. That scene stuck with me long after the movie ended. Tom Rhys Harries really sold the desperation without overdoing it VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.434 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.97 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.73 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Praises the memorable body horror and Tom Rhys Harries’s convincing, restrained performance. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises the body horror scenes as a memorable highlight and commends the lead actor's restrained performance. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Praises body horror scenes as the highlight, says the mirror scene stuck with them, and commends the lead actor's performance. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter praises the memorable body horror scenes and compliments the lead actor's convincing performance. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises body horror and the actor's performance as memorable highlights. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls the body horror the film’s highlight and praises the actor’s performance. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Calls the body horror the highlight, praises the scene and lead performance, and says it stuck with them. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises the body horror scenes and lead actor's performance as the highlight of the movie. | − | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #2 w 0.577 Him in the tub was great fx, drowning in himself VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.625 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.80 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.34 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Praises the special effects in the bathtub scene as great. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises the tub scene's effects as great; enjoyment of disturbing body-horror content counts as positive. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Praises a specific scene's effects as great, but only a narrow comment; still an explicit positive judgment of the film's craft. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter praises the visual effects of a specific scene in the film. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises the tub scene's effects as great. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls the tub scene’s effects great, expressing praise for the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Praises the film's effects for the tub scene as 'great,' an endorsement of the content. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises the special effects of a specific scene. | + | − | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #3 w 0.5 Yeah that whole sequence was great. I really liked it once he started to embrace the monster in him, and wish there'd been just a little bit more of that. Instead this was one of those origin stories where once we get the final product, the movie quickly ends. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.924 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.47 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Praises the sequence and embracing the monster, with mild disappointment that the fully realized character gets limited screen time. Claude Opus 5.5: mixed — Praises the monster sequence but criticizes the origin-story structure ending too quickly; no clear overall lean. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Praises the sequence and the monster embrace, with a mild complaint that the film ends too soon; overall leans favorable. Gemini 4 Argon: mixed — Praises a specific sequence and the later part, but criticizes the pacing and abrupt origin-story ending. Grok 4.7: mixed — Praises the monster sequence but criticizes the abrupt origin-story ending. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They liked the film and praised the sequence, though they wished it spent more time on the monster. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.924 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter states 'I really liked it' and praises the sequence, despite a minor critique about the ending. | + | − | 0 | + | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | + | + | + |
| thread #4 w 0.447 I’m just happy we didn’t get surf Dracula’d on him turning into the full Batman the Animated Series Clayface He used his powers perfectly in the context of the story, and he kept getting more powerful as time went on in a believable way. It didn’t go from 0 to supervillain… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.913 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.10 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.65 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Praises the film’s handling of Clayface’s powers and believable progression into a supervillain. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises the believable, well-paced power progression and the use of his powers in the story. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter praises how the film used Clayface's powers and escalated them believably, expressing satisfaction with the handling of the character. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Praises the believable pacing of the character's progression and how his powers were used in the story. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises believable power progression and story use. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Praises how his powers and transformation were handled, calling the progression believable and fitting the story. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.913 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter expresses satisfaction with the character's progression and power scaling, praising the execution. | + | 0 | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #5 w 0.408 LOVED that final night club scene. It was so cool. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.824 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.96 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.58 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Enthusiastically praises the final nightclub scene as cool. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Enthusiastic praise for the final nightclub scene; no criticism of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter explicitly says they loved the final night club scene and found it cool, indicating a favorable view of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly praises a specific scene in the movie, calling it 'so cool' and stating they 'LOVED' it. Grok 4.7: positive — Loved the final nightclub scene and called it cool. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They explicitly loved a scene and described it as cool. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter explicitly says they loved the nightclub scene and calls it cool, a clear praise verdict. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter explicitly states they loved a specific scene from the film. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #6 w 0.378 A 4DX showing was my only option with my schedule and the chairs moved with the direction he was dancing. That alone made it worth it VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER -0.026 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.77 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.32 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Says the synchronized 4DX chair movements alone made the viewing worthwhile. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Says the experience, including a dancing scene synced with 4DX seats, made it worth it. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Says the 4DX seat movement during the dance scene alone made the viewing worth it, implying an enjoyable experience. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states that a specific scene in 4DX 'made it worth it'. Grok 4.7: positive — Says the 4DX experience alone made the film worth seeing. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They praise the 4DX chair movement, but don't express an opinion about the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter says the 4DX chair movement made the experience worth it, implying enjoyment of the screening. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The 4DX experience made the viewing worth it. | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | 0 | + | + |
| thread #7 w 0.354 I was disappointed that he would change faces in a blink without any kind of morph effect. But the rapidity of the nightclub changes meant that wouldn't have worked. It was worth it. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.077 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.70 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Initial disappointment is outweighed by appreciation of the nightclub sequence; they explicitly conclude it was worth it. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Minor disappointment about the missing morph effect, but they accept the tradeoff and conclude 'It was worth it.' Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Minor initial disappointment about the lack of morph effect is resolved; the commenter concludes the choice 'was worth it,' leaning positive. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Initial disappointment with an effect is resolved by praising how it served the nightclub scene ('It was worth it'). Grok 4.7: positive — Notes a visual disappointment but concludes the choice was worth it. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They regret the missing morph effect but conclude the rapid changes were worth it. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter was disappointed by one effect but concludes the film was 'worth it', leaning positive overall. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Despite a minor disappointment with the visual effects, the commenter concludes that the movie 'was worth it'. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #8 w 0.333 I think that was down to the low budget but the nightclub scene really seemed to turn that weakness into a strength. It was so cool. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.617 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.98 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.65 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Praises the nightclub scene as cool and says it turned budget limitations into a strength. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises the nightclub scene for turning a low-budget weakness into a strength, calling it so cool. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Praises the nightclub scene as cool, saying it turned a low-budget weakness into a strength; mild budget caveat but overall favorable. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Praises a scene as 'so cool' and notes the film turned a low-budget weakness into a strength. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises nightclub scene for turning low budget into a strength. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They praise the nightclub scene as cool and say it turned the low-budget limitation into a strength. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter praises the nightclub scene as cool, turning a low-budget weakness into a strength. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter praises how the film turned a low budget into a strength, calling the scene cool. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #9 w 0.316 I love how it played into his theatrical personality while maintaining the menace of his powers. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.527 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.90 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.51 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Praises how the film balances the character's theatrical personality with the menace of his powers. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Commenter praises how the film balanced the character's theatrical personality with the menace of his powers. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter explicitly loves how the film portrayed the character, balancing theatrical personality with menace; clear praise of the film's execution. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly praises how the film balanced the character's theatrical personality and menacing powers. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises how the film balances theatrical personality and menace. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They praise how the film balances Clayface’s theatrical personality with the menace of his powers. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter praises the film's handling of the character's theatrical personality and menace, signaling approval. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter expresses clear enjoyment of how the film handled the character. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #10 w 0.302 Finally, a Gotham City where the people have Jersey accents. Had a fun time with this one VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.511 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.06 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.52 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — The commenter explicitly says they had a fun time with the film. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Says they had a fun time with the film; the accent remark is a lighthearted aside. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter says they had a fun time with the film, giving a clear positive verdict alongside a lighthearted joke about accents. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they 'had a fun time with this one' and praises a detail. Grok 4.7: positive — Explicitly says they had a fun time with the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They say they had a fun time watching the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter says they 'had a fun time with this one', clearly endorsing the film despite the sarcastic opener. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter states they 'had a fun time with this one', clearly indicating a positive verdict. | + | 0 | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #11 w 0.289 Batman is a jersey kid VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.11 P(pos)=0.97 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.38 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — A remark about Batman, with no judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — A joke or remark about Batman, with no judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — A joke or remark about Batman's character, with no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment makes a trivia observation/joke about Batman's origin without expressing any opinion on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Joke about Batman, no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A brief remark about Batman, with no judgment of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Joke about Batman actor's background; no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment is a joke/quote without any judgment of the film. | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #12 w 0.277 Hey jokah, you wanna kill Robin? Faghedabouit VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.38 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.71 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — A character-based joke with no judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Joke quote referencing characters; no judgement of the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — A joke or quote-style remark with no judgment of the film's quality or any recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment is just a joke/quote with no opinion or judgment expressed about the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Joke/quote with no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A joking reference to Robin and the Joker, with no opinion about the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Joking, nonsensical remark about killing Robin; no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment is a joke quote and does not express a verdict on the film. | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #13 w 0.267 Gotham looks excellent and the mobsters look like weirdos and that's perfect. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.832 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.94 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.39 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Praises Gotham’s appearance and the mobsters’ fittingly weird look as excellent and perfect. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises Gotham's look and the weird-looking mobsters as excellent and perfect. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Praises Gotham's look and the mobsters' design as 'excellent' and 'perfect', a favorable judgment on the film's visuals, though it doesn't address the whole film. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly praises the film's visual design and character appearances as 'excellent' and 'perfect'. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises Gotham's look and mobster designs as perfect. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Praises Gotham’s look and the mobsters’ unusual appearance as perfect. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Praises the film's visuals (Gotham looks excellent) and says the weird-looking mobsters are perfect, a clear approving verdict. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praising the visual style and atmosphere as 'excellent' and 'perfect'. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #14 w 0.258 When the mob guy is following the doctor and its an alley with flashing lights and big clown art I was like yes this is exactly some random gotham stuff VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.637 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.91 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.42 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Enthusiastically praises the alley scene for capturing Gotham’s distinctive atmosphere. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Enthusiastic approval of a scene's Gotham atmosphere; expresses enjoyment with no criticism. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter enthusiastically praises a scene for capturing authentic Gotham atmosphere ('yes this is exactly...'), indicating enjoyment of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter expresses appreciation for how well a specific scene captures the authentic Gotham atmosphere. Grok 4.7: positive — Enjoys the alley scene as authentic Gotham atmosphere. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They enjoy the Gotham-style alley scene and its atmosphere. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter enjoys a scene's atmosphere and calls it 'exactly some random gotham stuff', signaling approval of the film's look and tone. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Appreciates the accurate and atmospheric Gotham depiction. | + | − | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #15 w 0.25 I did notice right at the very end when Caitlyn came out of some stairs (maybe from the subway?) there was a map of Gotham on the wall and it was very clearly Gotham, not New York. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.458 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.30 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.60 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — The commenter identifies a Gotham map in a scene without evaluating the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Observational trivia about a Gotham map detail; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter shares an observation about a map detail at the end, with no judgement of the film's quality. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment merely points out a background detail without expressing an opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Observes a Gotham map detail; no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Points out a Gotham map detail without expressing an opinion about the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Observation about a map shown at the ending; no judgement of the film's quality or whether they'd recommend it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses a minor easter egg/detail without expressing an opinion on the film. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #16 w 0.243 Favorite scene has got to be when Caitlyn watches Matt sleeping and he shifts into her. Very creepy. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.556 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.97 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.75 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Calling the creepy transformation their favorite scene expresses appreciation for the film's horror. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Names a favorite scene and praises its creepiness, signaling enjoyment of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Names a favorite scene and calls it creepy as praise; implies enjoyment of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter praises a favorite scene in the film, calling it effectively creepy. Grok 4.7: positive — Names a favorite scene and praises its creepiness. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calling it their favorite scene expresses approval; the creepy description praises the unsettling effect. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter names a favorite scene and calls it 'very creepy', praising the disturbing content as a highlight. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter discusses a favorite scene without expressing an overall positive or negative verdict on the film. | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | 0 |
| thread #17 w 0.236 When he turns around and it's the guy 💀 VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.28 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.40 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Reacts to a scene without expressing an overall judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Reacts to a scene with a skull emoji but gives no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Reacts to a specific scene with an emoji and no judgement of the film itself; no clear like or dislike. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment is a brief reaction to a specific scene without offering an overall judgment on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Scene reaction only; no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Reacts humorously to a scene without expressing an opinion on the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Reacts to a plot moment with an emoji; no judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Reaction to a specific plot moment, no overall judgment of the film. | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #18 w 0.229 The only jump scare that got me VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.494 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.32 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.36 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Identifies a jump scare that startled them without judging the film overall. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Points to a single effective jump scare without judging the film overall. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Mentions a jump scare that startled them, but gives no clear judgment of the film's quality or a recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment reacts to a single moment/jump scare without expressing an overall opinion on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Notes one effective jump scare, no overall film judgment. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They mention one effective jump scare but give no overall judgment of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Mentions a jump scare that worked on them but gives no overall judgement of the film's quality or whether they'd recommend it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Effectively praising a horror element implies the film succeeded at scaring them. | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | + |
| thread #19 w 0.224 Legit got mad at myself for getting scared at sight of my beloved Eddie Marsan, lmao. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.273 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.44 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.35 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Describes being scared by a beloved actor's appearance without judging the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Humorous anecdote about being scared by Eddie Marsan; no clear judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Humorous remark about being scared by an actor's appearance; no explicit judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter jokes about getting jump-scared by an actor without expressing an overall opinion on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Joke about being scared by an actor, no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They describe being scared by an actor’s appearance but don’t judge the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Commenter reacts to a scare and a beloved actor's appearance; no clear judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment shares a personal reaction to an actor's appearance without expressing a verdict on the film. | + | − | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #20 w 0.218 Insanely erotic, such a great scene with it being his arms but her body... VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.372 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.96 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.62 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Explicitly praises the scene as great and intensely erotic. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises a scene as 'such a great scene,' expressing enjoyment of the film's content. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Praises a specific scene as 'such a great scene', expressing enjoyment of the film's content; no criticism. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly praises a specific scene as 'great' and 'insanely erotic'. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises a specific scene as insanely erotic and great. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls the scene great, expressing clear praise for the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter enthusiastically praises a scene as 'insanely erotic' and 'such a great scene', signalling approval of the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter expresses clear praise calling it 'insanely erotic' and 'such a great scene'. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #21 w 0.213 I thought the fiancé was gonna see the video and think she was sleeping with Matt! VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.85 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.42 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — The commenter describes an expected plot development without evaluating the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Comment shares a plot expectation without any judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment only recounts a plot expectation about the fiancé and a video; it offers no judgement of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment only discusses a plot prediction without expressing an opinion on the movie. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot speculation only; no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Speculates about a character's reaction to the video without evaluating the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Plot speculation about a character's reaction; no judgement of the film's quality or whether they'd recommend it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment only discusses a plot theory and does not judge the film itself. | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #22 w 0.209 As a Batman fan, the movie was exactly what I wanted it to be. A tragic tale of a man who loses himself, is overwhelmed by hubris, and becomes someone we want to see an eventual Batman take down. I actually found it a bit more heartbreaking than I expected to. Mike Flanagan… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.129 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.64 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Loved the tragic story and body horror; script criticisms don't outweigh strong praise and an 8/10 rating. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Loved it as a Batman and body horror fan; script flaws noted but rates it 8/10 overall. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Says it was exactly what they wanted as both Batman and body horror fan, gives 8/10; script criticisms are minor. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter gives an 8/10 rating and says the movie was exactly what they wanted despite minor script flaws. Grok 4.7: positive — Loved it as Batman and body-horror fan; 8/10 despite script flaws. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They loved the film’s tragic story and body horror, and gave it 8/10 despite some script and pacing flaws. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER -0.129 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The reviewer rates it an 8/10 and states it was exactly what they wanted it to be. | − | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #23 w 0.204 I also think that out of all the cinematic adaptations of Gotham, this is the most that looks like Gotham from a set design stand point. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.414 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.81 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.60 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Praises the film’s set design as the most authentic cinematic depiction of Gotham. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises the film's set design as the most Gotham-like of any adaptation, a clear compliment. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Praises the film's set design as the most faithful cinematic depiction of Gotham, an explicit positive judgment of the film's craft. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Praises the film's set design as the most authentic cinematic adaptation of Gotham. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises the film’s Gotham set design as the most authentic. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Praises the film’s Gotham set design as the most convincing among cinematic adaptations. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter praises the film's set design as the most Gotham-like of adaptations, a favorable judgement of the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises the set design of the film as the best adaptation. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #24 w 0.2 I LOVED how Gotham felt in this movie, I loved all the neon and dark creepy alleys and streets and that amusement mile sign was pure Batman Gotham VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.907 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.98 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.92 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Enthusiastically praises the movie’s Gotham atmosphere, neon visuals, and creepy streets. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Enthusiastic praise for the film's depiction of Gotham, its neon visuals and atmosphere. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter explicitly says they loved how Gotham felt, praising the neon, dark alleys, and Batman-style atmosphere of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter enthusiastically praises the movie's setting and atmosphere. Grok 4.7: positive — Loved Gotham's look and atmosphere in the movie. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Strong praise for the movie’s Gotham atmosphere and visual style. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter says they loved the film's Gotham setting, neon, creepy alleys, and praises the amusement mile sign as pure Batman Gotham. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter explicitly states they loved the movie's atmosphere and setting. | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #25 w 0.196 I haven’t seen the film myself, but it’s interesting you say “more heartbreaking than you expected”. I’m generally not a huge horror person and was shocked to find how moved I was by the movie The Fly. I really felt for his character and it just felt like a tragedy. And I think… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.96 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.77 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.55 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Has not seen Clayface; discusses emotional reactions to The Fly and body horror generally. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter hasn't seen Clayface; discusses The Fly and body horror generally. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter hasn't seen Clayface; they discuss The Fly and body horror generally, giving no verdict on this film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter explicitly states they haven't seen the film and discusses another movie instead. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Hasn't seen Clayface; discusses The Fly and body horror generally. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They explicitly haven’t seen Clayface; they discuss their reaction to The Fly and body horror generally. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Commenter explicitly hasn't seen Clayface; they discuss The Fly and body horror generally, with no judgement of this film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter explicitly states they have not seen the film. | − | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #26 w 0.192 It was actually having watched The Fly that helped me get a better understanding and love for Clayface. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.796 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.58 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.61 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Watching The Fly helped the commenter better understand and love Clayface. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Says watching The Fly gave them a better understanding of, and love for, Clayface, implying they enjoyed the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter says they gained a better understanding and love for Clayface, implying a favorable view of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment expresses love for the character Clayface in general, not a verdict on a specific Clayface movie. Grok 4.7: positive — Says watching The Fly deepened their love for Clayface. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They express greater appreciation for Clayface as a character, but give no verdict on the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter says watching The Fly helped them understand and love Clayface, expressing clear affection for the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Watching another film helped them gain a better understanding and love for Clayface. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | 0 | + | 0 | + | + |
| thread #27 w 0.189 The third act did go fast but the movie certainly didn't need to be 15 mins longer. Could maybe speed up some of the earlier stuff. Felt like it was trying to let you sit in the world like a 70s movie tho. So hard to give that up in favor of more time at the end VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.897 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.90 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.95 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Offers mild pacing criticism: the third act felt rushed, while earlier material could have moved faster. Claude Opus 5.5: mixed — Notes pacing flaws (rushed third act, slow start) but appreciates the 70s-style immersive world-building; no clear overall lean. Claude Sonnet 5.5: mixed — Criticizes the rushed third act and slow early pacing, but defends the runtime and appreciates the 70s-style atmosphere; no clear overall lean. Gemini 4 Argon: mixed — Discusses pacing issues in the first and third acts while appreciating the 1970s-style atmosphere, without a clear overall lean. Grok 4.7: mixed — Mild pacing critique balanced by appreciation of the film’s deliberate atmosphere. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): mixed — They criticize the pacing but appreciate the film’s deliberate, immersive 70s-style atmosphere. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): mixed — VADER 0.897 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): mixed — Pacing issues mentioned, but also appreciates the 70s vibe, leading to a balanced critique. | + | − | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #28 w 0.186 Him posing with the actor who replaced him on the red carpet was peak aura. VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.34 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.36 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Calling the red-carpet moment “peak aura” enthusiastically praises a scene in the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Comment praises a red carpet moment, not the film itself; no judgement of the movie. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment praises a red carpet moment involving the actors, not a judgment of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment describes a red carpet event or plot point without expressing an opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Red-carpet trivia, no judgment of the film itself. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Praises a red-carpet moment, not the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on a red carpet photo moment and its 'aura'; no judgement of the film itself is expressed. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses a character action/joke without judging the film. | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #29 w 0.183 The edits of that are gonna be everywhere on social media. Lol. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.421 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.28 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.47 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Predicts social media edits without expressing an opinion on the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Joke predicting social media edits of a scene; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment predicts social media edits of the film; it offers no judgment of the film's quality or a recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment makes a prediction about social media edits without expressing an opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Joke about social-media edits, no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Predicts social media edits without expressing an opinion about the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment predicts social media edits of a scene; it does not judge whether the film is good or recommended. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses social media edits without expressing a judgement on the film. | + | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #30 w 0.18 That scene was so satisfying. His former agent sliming her way back to him as well. Proper Hollywood. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.716 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.98 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.69 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Calls a scene satisfying and appreciates its depiction of Hollywood opportunism. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls a scene 'so satisfying' and appreciates the Hollywood satire; clear enjoyment of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Calls a scene 'so satisfying' and approves of the Hollywood-style payoff, which reads as praise of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter praises a specific scene as 'so satisfying' and appreciates its portrayal of Hollywood. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls a scene satisfying and enjoys the Hollywood depiction. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls the scene satisfying, expressing approval of the film moment. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter finds the scene 'so satisfying' and frames it approvingly, signaling enjoyment of the film's content. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter describes a scene as 'so satisfying' and praises the Hollywood vibe. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #31 w 0.177 Caitlyn gets a very horrifying ending. Always having to look over her shoulder and not truly knowing if whoever she’s talking to is actually them. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.751 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.93 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.34 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Describes the horror of Caitlyn’s ending without judging the film’s quality or recommending it. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Describes a character's horrifying fate without judging the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Describes a character's ending and its horror without judging the film's quality or recommending it. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Describes a character's horrifying plot ending without expressing an opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Describes a character's horrifying ending without judging the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Describes a character’s horrifying ending without expressing an opinion about the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Describes a plot point about a character's ending and paranoia; no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses a plot point and a character's fate without expressing a judgment on the film itself. | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #32 w 0.174 Well, at least when she was about to hit the killswitch and seemed to hesitate, Matt said "Do it" right? As opposed to trying to fight/kill her to survive. And i don't think Matt ever tried to harm her physically So perhaps her unease is made at least slightly better because… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.659 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.04 P(pos)=0.02 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.61 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Discusses character motivations and perceived danger without judging the film’s quality. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses plot details and character motivations without judging the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses plot details and character motivations without expressing any judgement on whether the film is good or recommended. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Pure plot and character motivation discussion without any opinion or judgment on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot speculation about characters; no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses character actions and motivations without judging the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses plot details and a character's motivations in a scene; no judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses plot details and character motivations without expressing a judgment on the film itself. | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #33 w 0.171 Speaking of that, I liked that she actually used the kill switch, but he survived anyways. His body has mutated beyond control. As opposed to what I thought was happening, it not loading in time and him hitting the tablet away. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.747 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.77 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.73 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Praises the kill-switch scene and its explanation that his mutation allowed him to survive. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Commenter says they liked a specific plot choice; mild approval of the film's writing, no criticism. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Mostly plot discussion; the 'I liked that she used the kill switch' is a narrow plot-beat remark, not an overall verdict on the film. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they liked a specific plot point and how the scene was executed. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot clarification; liking one story beat is not a film verdict. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They express a preference about a plot event, but give no overall judgment of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Plot discussion about a kill switch and character survival; no clear judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter explicitly states 'I liked that she actually used the kill switch'. | + | + | + | + | + | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | + |
| thread #34 w 0.169 I assumed the taser just severed the connection for the kill switch to properly kill him, since she mentions that it's electrical signals that control them. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.361 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.06 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.52 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Explains a plot mechanism without expressing an opinion on the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Plot interpretation about the taser and kill switch; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter is explaining a plot point about the taser and kill switch, offering no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment is pure plot discussion and speculation without expressing any opinion on the movie. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot theory about a kill switch; no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Offers an interpretation of the kill switch mechanics without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Speculates about a plot mechanic (the taser and kill switch) without judging whether the film is good or recommended. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses a plot detail and mechanism without expressing any opinion or verdict on the film. | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #35 w 0.167 The problem with people like Clayface is that even if you give them what they want, you never know when they're gonna be unhinged enough to just snap on you and go for the kill. He's insane in every sense of the word. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.382 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.75 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.51 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Describes Clayface's dangerous, unstable character without judging the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Describes the character as insane and dangerous; no judgement of the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Describes the character's unpredictability and insanity; no judgment of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment analyzes the character's psychology and behavior without expressing an opinion on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Discusses the character as insane, not the film itself. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Describes Clayface as dangerous and insane, but gives no opinion on the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Describes the character as unhinged and dangerous, but says nothing about whether they liked the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses the character's traits without giving a verdict on the film. | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #36 w 0.164 Seeing how depraved Matt’s becomes by the time Creature Commandos happens I really hope she is safe VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.726 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.81 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Expresses concern for a character and discusses another show's events, without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Speculates about a character's fate in the wider universe; no judgement of the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Speculates about a character's fate and DC continuity; gives no judgment of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment only discusses character lore and plot speculation without expressing an opinion on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Character speculation and concern, no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Expresses concern for a character's safety, but gives no opinion on the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Speculates about a character's depravity and hopes for someone's safety in a later show; no judgement of this film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses plot continuity and characters without judging the film itself. | + | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #37 w 0.162 The cronies in this movie all had very distinct looking faces VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.56 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.40 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Observes the cronies’ distinctive appearances without expressing approval or criticism of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Neutral observation about the henchmen's appearance with no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Neutral observation about the actors' faces; it gives no judgment of the film's quality or any recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment makes a neutral observation about the character designs without expressing a positive or negative opinion. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Observes character faces without judging the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Observes that the cronies had distinct-looking faces without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment notes a visual detail about the cronies' faces without any judgement of whether the film is good or recommended. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment only discusses a minor detail about the cronies' faces without judging the film. | 0 | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #38 w 0.16 Yeah I loved that. They looked very much like Gotham henchmen lol VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.893 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.40 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.44 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Expresses love for the film detail and approvingly compares the characters to Gotham henchmen. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Expresses enjoyment of a specific detail, the Gotham-henchmen look, with no criticism of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter says 'I loved that' and compliments the look of the henchmen, indicating a favorable view of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they 'loved' a specific detail or aesthetic in the film. Grok 4.7: positive — Explicitly loved the henchmen look in the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They explicitly say they loved it. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter says they loved it; the joke about henchmen is a light aside, not criticism. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter explicitly states 'Yeah I loved that'. | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #39 w 0.158 I'm sad one of them wasn't like "IT'S DA CLAY" VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.638 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.42 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Jokes about a desired line without judging the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Joke about a missed line; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — A joking remark about a missed quote or reference; it expresses no overall judgment of the film's quality. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment is just a joke about a missed dialogue opportunity with no judgment on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Joke about a missing line, no film judgment. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A joke about a possible line; it expresses no opinion on the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — A wistful joke about a missing catchphrase; no clear judgement of the film's quality. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter is making a joke/reference about a line rather than judging the film itself. | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #40 w 0.156 I liked the one goon who looked like Wes Anderson. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.649 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.83 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.44 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Amused by a goon's resemblance to Wes Anderson, without judging the film overall. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Light joke about a minor character's appearance; no judgement of the film overall. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Only praises a minor character's appearance; gives no overall judgment of the film or a recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment makes a joke/observation about a background character without giving an overall verdict on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Joke about a goon resembling Wes Anderson, no film judgment. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They liked one character’s appearance but don’t judge the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Mentions a liked character detail but gives no overall judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Mentioning a minor detail without expressing an overall opinion on the film. | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #41 w 0.154 Clayface exists because he was a homewrecker, and Clayface exists to become a homewrecker. VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.06 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.58 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — A joke about the character's origins and purpose, without judging the film's quality. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Joke about the character's origin and nature; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment is a joking or thematic remark about the character's nature and plot, with no clear judgement of the film's quality. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment makes a joke or observation about the character's plot without expressing an opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Character joke or plot quip, no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A joke about Clayface’s character, with no judgment of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Describes the character's narrative role and motivation without giving any judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Plot discussion and character observation without judgment of the film itself. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #42 w 0.152 I was saying to myself during the film if this man could just eat at home he’d be alright. Always gunning for another mans girl! VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.316 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.94 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.68 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Jokes about the character’s romantic choices without judging the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Joking commentary about a character's behavior; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — A joking remark about the character's behavior and plot; no clear judgment of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment makes a joke about a character's actions without expressing an opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Character joke about his behavior, no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Comments humorously on the character’s behavior without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment jokes about a character's behavior and says nothing about the film's quality or whether they'd recommend it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment is a joke about the plot and character actions without expressing a judgment on the film. | + | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #43 w 0.151 Am I losing my mind or was that the most random Aaron Paul cameo in the history of film? VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.382 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.76 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.44 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Remarks on the randomness of a cameo without expressing an overall judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Comments on a surprising cameo without judging the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment only remarks on a surprising cameo; it gives no judgment of the film's quality or a recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment merely points out a random celebrity cameo without expressing an opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Joke about a random cameo; no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A humorous observation about the cameo, without judging the film overall. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on a cameo's randomness without expressing an overall judgement of the film's quality or whether they'd recommend it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment only discusses a cameo/trivia and expresses confusion without judging the film. | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #44 w 0.149 From what I understand, he was cast as Matt's dad, and we were supposed to see a flashback, but they all got cut. So now we just have a "blink, and you miss it" Aaron Paul cameo that is so shocking and unintentionally funny. The best part is that at least it was in the final… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.919 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.05 P(pos)=0.03 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.40 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Discusses a cut flashback and amusing cameo, praising one scene without expressing an overall verdict on the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Mostly trivia about a cut Aaron Paul role; praising one scene isn't an overall verdict on the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Mostly trivia about a cut cameo, but calls the Club scene 'the best scene in the whole film'; this is only mild praise of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Discusses a cut role and a funny cameo in the best scene without giving an overall verdict on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Trivia about a cut cameo; no overall judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls the final Club scene the best in the film, expressing clear praise for a scene. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — VADER 0.919 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): mixed — Praises the club scene as the best, but mocks the cameo as unintentionally funny. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | 0 |
| thread #45 w 0.147 HE CANT KEEP GETTING AWAY WITH THIS VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.59 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.46 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — A quoted exclamation without any clear judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Meme-style joke reaction, likely about a character; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Exclamation likely about a character's actions in the plot; no judgment of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment is a meme/quote and does not express an opinion on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Meme reaction with no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A reaction meme without a clear judgment of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment is about a character's actions ('he can't keep getting away with this') without any judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Meme quote without any judgment of the film. | 0 | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #46 w 0.146 Clayface is a good horror movie Tom Rhys Harries performance is great! I have not seen him a lot in other projects but this is a breakout role for him. I like that he played Matt as an impulsive person with Mia, the nanites, and the first couple of killings. All the other… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.984 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.85 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Calls it a good horror movie and great DCU addition, praising performances and standout scenes despite pacing criticisms. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls it a good horror movie with great performances and kills; minor pacing and gore critiques, but overall a great addition. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Calls it a good horror movie and a great addition to the DCU, praising the lead performance and kills. Minor pacing and gore criticisms don't change the lean. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly calls it a good horror movie, praises the performances and scenes, and deems it a great addition. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls it a good horror movie and great DCU addition despite minor pacing notes. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They praise the performances, scenes, and film overall as a great addition, despite some pacing and body-horror reservations. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Calls it a good horror movie, praises performance, standout scenes, and says it's a great addition to the DCU. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter calls it a good horror movie, praises the performances and scenes, and calls it a great addition. | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #47 w 0.144 I swear I saw Aaron Paul in the club too, but I checked his IMDB and there’s no credit. Possible he didn’t want credit for the role? Oh well, the internet will find out who it was soon. Haha. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.824 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.07 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.88 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Speculates about an actor’s possible cameo without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Speculates about a possible uncredited Aaron Paul cameo; offers no judgement of the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter discusses a possible Aaron Paul cameo and IMDB credits; no judgement of the film's quality. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment only discusses a possible actor cameo without expressing any opinion on the movie itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Speculates about an uncredited cameo; no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Speculates about an actor's possible appearance and credit; gives no opinion of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Speculation about an uncredited cameo in the film; no judgement of the film's quality expressed. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter discusses a cameo theory and IMDB credits, not the film itself. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #48 w 0.143 It's him. Early on in Clayface , we learn about an in-universe film called "One Bad Day" - thematically funny reference to Alan Moore's Batman one-shot - and then the film is brought up several other times after that, along with the fictional actor that played a role in it.… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.202 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.00 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.88 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Explains a plot detail and actor transformation without expressing any judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Explains an in-universe reference and plot detail without judging the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment explains a plot detail and in-universe reference without giving any judgement of the film's quality. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment merely describes plot points and trivia without expressing an overall opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot theory and trivia about an in-universe reference, no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Describes film references and a transformation scene without expressing an opinion of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — VADER 0.202 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment only discusses plot details and Easter eggs without expressing a judgment or recommendation. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #49 w 0.141 I think Paul actually played his father? The guy called him the nickname they mentioned when they attacked him. The one nut whatever VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.153 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.04 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.86 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Discusses a character's identity and plot details without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Plot discussion about a character identity; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Plot speculation about a character's identity and a nickname; no judgement of the film's quality. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment only discusses a plot detail and casting without expressing an opinion on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot theory about casting and nicknames, no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — The comment speculates about a plot detail and gives no opinion on the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Plot speculation about a character's identity; no judgement of the film's quality or whether they'd recommend it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses a plot theory and character details without judging the film. | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #50 w 0.14 It was actually reported that he joined the movie in a minor role - https://www.reddit.com/r/comicbooks/comments/1u9vx5p/aaron_paul_joins_dc_studios_clayface_film_in/ It was probably some scenes that were cut VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.273 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.12 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.88 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Discusses a reported casting and potentially cut scenes without evaluating the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Casting trivia and speculation about cut scenes; no judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses casting news and possible cut scenes; no judgment of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment only discusses casting trivia and potentially cut scenes without expressing an opinion on the movie. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Casting trivia and cut scenes, no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses casting reports and possibly cut scenes, without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses casting news and deleted scenes, with no judgement of the film's quality or whether the commenter would recommend it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment only discusses casting reports and cut scenes without expressing a personal judgment on the film. | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #51 w 0.139 Scissors shoulda been banned from airplanes yesterday.. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.459 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.98 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.58 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Jokes about scissors on airplanes without expressing an opinion of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Joke referencing a plot element; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Cryptic joke or reference, likely to a scene; no clear judgement of the film's quality. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment makes a joke or plot reference without expressing an opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Joke or plot quip with no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A joke about scissors on airplanes, with no judgment of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Cryptic joke about scissors on airplanes; no judgement of the film itself expressed. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — A joke or quote about a plot element, not a verdict on the film. | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #52 w 0.137 Well now I’m stuck thinking about whether or not 9/11 happened in the DC universe. VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.026 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.13 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.31 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — The comment speculates about DC universe history without expressing an opinion on the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Musing about DC universe continuity; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — A tangential musing about DC universe continuity; no judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment only discusses a lore question/joke about the fictional universe without expressing any opinion on the movie. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Joke about DC universe continuity, no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Speculates about the DC universe without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — The comment is a tangential musing about the DC universe and 9/11, with no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses a random fictional worldbuilding thought, not the film itself. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #53 w 0.136 Lanterns has an important plot scene that depends on a character's reaction when Hal asks them about , which at least faintly implies that recent American history in the DCU is more or less the same as our own. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.202 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.03 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.71 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Discusses Lanterns plot implications for DCU history without judging Clayface. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses a plot detail in Lanterns and DCU continuity; no judgement of Clayface. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses a plot detail from a different DC project (Lanterns) and DCU continuity; no judgement of Clayface. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment discusses universe lore and another project ('Lanterns') without expressing an opinion on 'Clayface'. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Discusses DCU continuity trivia, not a judgment of Clayface. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses a plot implication in Lanterns, not an opinion about Clayface. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on plot details and references to another show (Lanterns) without giving any judgement of Clayface itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses a plot detail and continuity without expressing a judgment on the film. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #54 w 0.135 I'm glad this doesn't tread the same pitfalls as Venom/Joker/Morbin' Time of giving a villain his own movie just to completely separate any connective tissue to their respective superhero rivals in the process. Could never imagine Spider-Man fighting Sony-Verse Venom, Morbin'… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.851 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.96 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.39 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Praises the film’s villain characterization, motivation, and Batman connections, expressing enthusiasm for Clayface’s future appearances. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises the film for establishing motivation, avoiding antihero pitfalls, and staying connected to Batman; wants Clayface back. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Praises the film for avoiding villain-movie pitfalls, establishing Clayface's motivation well, and avoiding antihero nonsense; wants to see the character again. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter praises the characterization, motivation, and avoids pitfalls of similar villain-centric movies, wanting to see the character again. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises the film's motivation and continuity; wants Clayface to return. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Praises the film’s handling of Clayface and says it effectively establishes his motivation without turning him into an antihero. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER -0.851 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises the movie's handling of the villain, motivations, and connections, expressing disappointment if there isn't a sequel. | − | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #55 w 0.134 I think eeeeevrything is more of a result of him being an absolute moron on top of being PoS. If Mat wasn’t dumb he absolutely could’ve gotten the doctor and got away with “revenge” VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.691 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.89 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Criticizes a character’s intelligence and discusses revenge, without judging the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses a character's stupidity and plot alternatives; no judgement of the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses a character's motivations and plot; criticizes the character, not the film, and gives no overall verdict. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Discusses a character's actions and intelligence within the plot without expressing an opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot talk criticizing a character's stupidity, not the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Criticizes a character’s intelligence and actions, but gives no opinion on the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Commenter insults the character Matt as dumb and a POS, discussing plot logic, without judging the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses character actions and plot choices without judging the film itself. | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #56 w 0.132 I keep thinking about how the nightclub scene was basically Matt Hagen letting the cat out of the bag through lack of any caring as to if his tracks should be covered at all. Before that he got quite far on how little GCPD and the gangsters knew about his powers and the… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.226 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.88 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.45 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Discusses Matt Hagen’s strategy and plot consequences without judging the film’s quality. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Analyzes the character's choices in the nightclub scene without judging the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses plot and character behavior (Matt Hagen's carelessness in the nightclub scene) without judging the film's quality or recommending it. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Pure plot discussion analyzing a character's actions and motivations without expressing an opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot analysis of a scene and character choices, no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses a character’s actions and plot consequences without judging the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — VADER 0.226 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses plot details and character actions without expressing a judgment or recommendation about the film. | + | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #57 w 0.131 i was scared the split second scene in the rain was going to be our only look at clayface in his huge form. but so glad we got a really good look at the end. actually doesnt look horrible, in fact id say it looked pretty dang good VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.973 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.88 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.37 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Praises Clayface’s appearance and expresses satisfaction with the substantial reveal at the end. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises the final reveal of Clayface's huge form, saying it looked pretty dang good. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter is glad about the final look at Clayface and says the effects looked pretty good, expressing satisfaction with the film's payoff. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter praises the character's design and final appearance, stating it looked "pretty dang good." Grok 4.7: positive — Glad they showed Clayface fully and says the look was pretty dang good. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They’re glad the film showed Clayface’s huge form and praise how it looked. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter is relieved by the creature's look and says it looks pretty good, a clear approving verdict on the film's visuals. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter is glad they got a good look at Clayface and states that it looked pretty dang good. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #58 w 0.13 The final DCU design was so shocking because it is exactly what the fans want, but it had a really interesting detail that's a fun twist and super depressing. Instead of it being 1:1, at the end, Clayface only has one white eye, with the other still being blue with pupils, the… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.883 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.08 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.52 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Praises the final design’s interesting twist and poignant visual representation of Clayface’s remaining humanity. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises the final design as exactly what fans want, with an interesting, poignant detail about lingering humanity. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Praises the final Clayface design as what fans want and a fun, poignant detail, though it's about one design element, not the whole film. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Praises the character design as 'exactly what the fans want' with a 'really interesting detail' and 'fun twist'. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Design and plot detail discussion, no overall film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They praise the Clayface design as what fans want and call its detail an interesting twist. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses a design detail and its story meaning; no explicit judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises the design, details, and emotional impact of the movie's ending. | + | 0 | 0 | + | + | + | + | 0 | + | 0 | + |
| thread #59 w 0.129 Final form with the mouth torn open sideways reminded me of mutated Grant from Slither (but was prob a call back to his mouth getting cut open Glasgow smile style) VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.214 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.80 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.35 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Describes a visual similarity and possible callback without evaluating the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Compares the creature design to Slither and notes a possible callback, without judging the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Describes the final form's design and compares it to Slither; makes observations without judging the film's quality. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment merely observes a visual similarity and callback without expressing an opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Visual comparison and callback note, no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Compares a visual detail to another film and suggests a callback, without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses a visual design and its reference to another film, with no judgement of Clayface itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment only discusses visual similarities and callbacks without expressing an opinion or verdict on the film. | + | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #60 w 0.128 I liked the ambiguity of Matt’s backstory that some people don’t seem to like. Like I can buy that there were people in his past who were jealous that he made it out of the bad neighborhood or they thought that he was stuck-up and that he was too good for him. And maybe some of… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.811 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.41 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.67 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Praises the backstory’s ambiguity and overall character portrayal, appreciating the nuanced depiction of flaws. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Commenter praises the ambiguous backstory and says they liked the overall portrayal of Matt's character. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter praises the ambiguous backstory and overall portrayal of the main character, defending choices others dislike; implies appreciation of the film's writing. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly praises the ambiguity of the backstory and the overall portrayal of the main character. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises the character's ambiguous backstory and overall portrayal. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They explicitly liked the backstory ambiguity and overall portrayal of the character. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.811 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter explicitly states 'I liked the overall portrayal' and defends aspects of the film's writing. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #61 w 0.127 Honestly his character trait of going after women who are taken was a highlight for me. The first one gets him killed and the second one gets him killed. Hes a man who does not learn from his mistakes and refuses to move on. Theres no redemption to his character either when… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.128 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.67 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Calls the character's repeated mistakes and lack of redemption a highlight, praising an aspect of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls the character's flawed, unredeemed trait a highlight for them; character criticism isn't film criticism. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Calls the protagonist's flawed, unredeemed character trait 'a highlight for me', praising the film's characterization despite describing him negatively. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter praises a specific character trait and narrative choice, calling it a 'highlight for me'. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls the character's flawed trait a personal highlight, praising the writing. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They call the character trait a highlight, praising an element of the film despite describing the character critically. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Analyzes the character's behavior and plot beats without any judgment of the film itself as good or bad. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter highlights specific character traits and narrative choices as a positive aspect of the film. | − | − | − | + | + | + | + | + | + | 0 | + |
| thread #62 w 0.126 I’m so glad they didn’t shy away from the fact that he can morph into people. I thought it was cool how they decided to show that he also can change clothes so the cinema sins fans won’t talk about it VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.085 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.06 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.90 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Praises the film’s depiction of his morphing abilities and its attention to clothing transformations. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Expresses gladness and calls the morphing depiction cool; appreciative of the film's choices. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter is glad about and praises the film's choices (morphing ability, clothes detail), indicating a favorable view of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter expresses happiness and calls the film's handling of the character's powers cool. Grok 4.7: positive — Glad they showed morphing and clothing changes; calls the choice cool. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They praise the film for embracing Clayface’s morphing abilities and find the clothing-change detail cool. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter is glad the film embraced Clayface's morphing and finds it cool; approval of the film's choices. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter praises specific creative choices in the film, calling them 'cool' and expressing gladness. | + | 0 | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #63 w 0.125 The thing about the morphing into people that annoyed me is that the actual transformation was like 6 frames long. I wanted to see his flesh deform and reform into the person's face, not a quick eye blink. VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER -0.026 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.98 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.65 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Criticizes the overly quick transformations, expressing disappointment with the film’s visual execution. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Criticizes a specific element, the too-brief morphing effect; no praise offered, so it leans negative. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Commenter criticizes the morphing transformation effect as too brief and disappointing, expressing annoyance about a specific aspect of the film without any offsetting praise. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter criticizes the execution of the morphing visual effects, expressing annoyance that the transformations were too brief. Grok 4.7: negative — Annoyed the morph was only a few frames, not a detailed transformation. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They criticize the transformation effect as too brief and say they wanted to see more. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — VADER -0.026 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter expresses annoyance with a specific aspect of the film's visual effects. | 0 | − | 0 | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #64 w 0.124 Agreed, I'm sure budget was a big factor in this, but it would have been cool to see his face rearrange instead of just snap into the next face. It worked for the club scene, though. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.631 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.33 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.76 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): mixed — Criticizes the abrupt facial transformations but says the effect worked in the club scene. Claude Opus 5.5: mixed — Criticizes the face-change effect as cheap, but says it worked in the club scene. No overall verdict on the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: mixed — Criticizes the face-change effect as abrupt and budget-limited, but concedes it worked well in the club scene; no clear overall lean. Gemini 4 Argon: mixed — Expresses mild disappointment with a visual effect choice while praising its execution in one specific scene, showing no overall verdict. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Discusses one effect choice, not an overall film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): mixed — They criticize the face transitions but say the effect worked in the club scene. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): mixed — Wishes the face-morphing were better but says it worked in one scene; criticism and mild praise balance out. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): mixed — Criticizes the transformation effect but praises how it worked in the club scene. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #65 w 0.123 I'm surprised that Matt didn't piece together that his friend ratted him out much earlier seeing how the mob boss guy knew the exact quote Matt said when told not to mess with that girl VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.736 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.05 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.40 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Discusses a character's failure to recognize a plot clue without judging the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Plot observation about a character's reasoning; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Plot observation about a character's missed inference; it doesn't clearly judge the film overall as good or bad. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment only discusses a plot detail and character logic without judging the quality of the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot logic observation only; no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on a character's deduction in the plot without judging the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Plot nitpick about a character's reasoning; no judgement of the film's quality or whether they'd recommend it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses a plot point and character actions without expressing a judgment on the film. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #66 w 0.122 I thought it was a solid, good movie. Like a square 7/10. But I can’t help but feel had it been in a more capable director and a bit more budget we could’ve had an amazing movie. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.948 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.96 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Calls it a solid, good movie and rates it 7/10, despite wishing for better direction and budget. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls it solid and good, 7/10; the wish for a better director doesn't undo the positive lean. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Calls it a solid, good movie, 7/10; the criticism about director and budget is speculative, and the overall lean is positive. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Calls it a 'solid, good movie' and rates it 7/10 despite wishing it reached higher potential. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls it a solid good 7/10 despite wishing for more. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They call it a solid, good 7/10 movie, while noting it could have been even better. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Calls it a solid, good movie rating 7/10; the wishful 'could've been amazing' note is a secondary criticism, not an overall negative lean. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter explicitly calls it a 'solid, good movie' and a '7/10', despite wishing for a better director. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #67 w 0.121 I think once it gets into the third act it decides to make itself a good version of the sonyverse villain films instead of trying to hit a big swing (and potential big miss) like Joker VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.178 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.96 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.59 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Calls it a good version of Sony's villain films, despite suggesting the third act plays things safe. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls the third act a 'good version' of Sonyverse villain films; the safer choice is framed neutrally, not criticised. Claude Sonnet 5.5: mixed — Calls it a 'good version' of Sonyverse villain films but implies it plays safe rather than swinging big like Joker; no clear overall lean. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Describes the film as a 'good version' of villain films in its third act, avoiding a 'big miss'. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls the third act a good version of Sony villain films. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They describe it as a good version of villain films, while noting it is less ambitious than Joker. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): mixed — Commenter says the third act plays it safe rather than taking a big swing, but calls it a good version of its genre; no clear overall lean. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): mixed — Praises the third act as a good villain film, but criticizes it for playing it safe instead of taking risks. | + | + | 0 | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | 0 | 0 |
| thread #68 w 0.12 Was afraid its gonna go down the road where Clayface is an anti hero like the Sony villains. But then we see the detective lying on the floor, yeah I think I like my villains when they are pieces of shite, with this and The Penguin. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.788 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.59 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Praises the film’s choice to portray Clayface as a genuine villain rather than an antihero. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Relieved Clayface stayed a true villain rather than an anti-hero; says they like it, comparing favorably to The Penguin. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Relieved the film avoided making Clayface an anti-hero; enjoys him as a proper villain. Implied approval, though based on a scene or trailer. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter praises the characterization of Clayface as a true villain rather than an anti-hero. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises the film for making Clayface a true villain, not an anti-hero. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They appreciate that Clayface is portrayed as a genuinely villainous character rather than an antihero. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter approves of the film's choice to keep Clayface a villain, saying they like villains who are 'pieces of shite'. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter likes that the villain is pure evil and explicitly states 'I think I like my villains'. | − | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #69 w 0.12 I loved that Matt being an actor plays critical role when he's claying around, the fact that he can pick up other people's mannerisms and improvise some bit to smooth out suspicion was so convincing VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.612 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.35 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.81 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Praises how Matt's acting skills convincingly inform his transformations and improvisation. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Commenter loved how the character's acting background was used and found it convincing. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter says they loved how Matt's acting background shaped the film and found his mimicry convincing, which is praise of the film's writing. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly praises how the protagonist's acting background is utilized and finds it very convincing. Grok 4.7: positive — Loved a key plot device and found it convincing. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They praise the character concept and find his impersonations and improvisation convincing. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter says they loved the film's use of Matt being an actor and found it convincing. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter explicitly states they loved a key aspect of the film's execution. | + | 0 | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #70 w 0.119 Yeah and the way he’s just completely clowning on the bad guys and taking them for a run around lol VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.128 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.93 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.52 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Amused description of a character outsmarting villains, without a judgment of the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Describes a scene with amusement but gives no clear judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Describes a scene or character behavior with amusement, but gives no explicit judgment of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Describes a character's actions with amusement, without stating an overall opinion on the movie itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Amused plot description, no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They sound entertained by Clayface outsmarting and messing with the villains. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter enjoys the character 'clowning on the bad guys' and finds the action amusing, a light approving tone toward the film's content. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Enjoys a scene in the film, praising the action with amusement. | + | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | + | + |
| thread #71 w 0.118 I was throwing my hands up at the end of the film, thinking this made no sense for Caitlyn’s character, and then the movie promptly told to shut the fuck up lmao VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.202 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.90 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Describes a perceived character inconsistency that the ending immediately addresses, without clearly judging the film overall. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Initial doubt about Caitlyn's arc was cleverly resolved by the film; amused, satisfied reaction. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Initially doubted a plot choice, but the film addressed it and won them over; amused, approving tone implies a favorable take. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Praises the film's clever twist at the end that resolved an apparent character inconsistency. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot reaction and joke; no overall judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They initially doubted the character choice, but imply the film soon gave a satisfying answer. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): mixed — Initially felt the ending made no sense for the character, but laughs at the film's brash handling of it, so the lean is unclear. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter enjoyed the plot twist resolving their initial frustration, indicating a favorable reaction. | − | − | − | 0 | + | + | + | 0 | + | 0 | + |
| thread #72 w 0.117 I thought she was a figment of his imagination and it served to show how his mental health was declining. Turns out it was an even worse showcase of the state of his mental health 💀 VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.477 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.80 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Interprets a character and the portrayal of declining mental health without judging the film's quality. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses plot interpretation of character's mental health without judging the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses plot and character interpretation (a character's mental health) without judging the film's quality or recommending it. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Discusses a plot twist regarding a character's mental health without expressing an opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot interpretation of a twist; no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They interpret the character’s mental state and the plot reveal, without judging the film’s quality. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Offers a theory about the plot and character's mental state, with no judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Criticizes the plot twist regarding mental health as a worse showcase, indicating disappointment with the film. | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | − |
| thread #73 w 0.116 Imagine Nathan Fielder's documentary about Caitlyn Corr's questionable medical technology and the fallout from that. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.296 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.21 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.76 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Imagines a documentary scenario without expressing any judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Joke reframing the plot as a Nathan Fielder documentary; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — A joke or speculative scenario about a fictional documentary; it gives no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment makes a joke about a hypothetical documentary without expressing an opinion on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Joke comparison with no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Imagines a documentary premise about the technology and its fallout without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Joke/hypothetical comparison about a different documentary premise; makes no judgement of the film Clayface itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses a conceptual idea for the movie rather than judging the film itself. | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #74 w 0.115 As a mob boss, the antagonist is pretty faithful to his girlfriend VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.494 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.75 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.73 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Comments on the antagonist’s relationship behavior without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — A joking observation about a character's behavior, with no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — A casual observation about the antagonist's characterization, with no judgment of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment makes an observation about a character's behavior without expressing an opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Character observation only; no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A humorous observation about the antagonist, with no judgment of the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Plot observation about a character's relationship; no judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses a plot detail without expressing any judgment or verdict on the film itself. | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #75 w 0.115 Bro's a weird cuck, lets his girl get screwed before fucking up the guy VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.494 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.92 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.67 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Insults a character and describes their actions without judging the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Crude remark about a character's actions; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Crude plot/character description with no judgment of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment describes a character's actions in the plot without expressing an opinion on the quality of the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Character insult and plot beat, no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on a character’s behavior, without judging the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Insults a character's behavior in plot terms; no judgement of the film itself is expressed. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment is a joke/plot observation about a character's actions rather than a review of the film. | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #76 w 0.114 Feels like this movie could have used a little more time in the kiln to become something really special, but I still enjoyed it overall. The third act in the nightclub when he’s shapeshifting and melting and reforming is super fun, and worth trudging through the less stellar… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.994 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.81 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Explicitly enjoyed it overall, praising creative visuals and premise execution despite uneven sections and a miscast mob boss. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Enjoyed it overall, praising visuals and third act despite pacing issues and a miscast mob boss. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Says they enjoyed it overall, praising the third act, visuals and creativity, despite pacing and miscasting complaints; leans positive. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Despite noting some flaws and miscasting, the commenter explicitly states they 'still enjoyed it overall' and praises the visuals. Grok 4.7: positive — Enjoyed it overall despite flaws; praised visuals, creativity, and premise. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Despite criticizing the third act’s buildup and a miscast role, they enjoyed the film and praised its visuals, creativity, and premise. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Says they enjoyed it overall, praises fun visuals and creative directions, and hopes for more such films despite flaws. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Despite some flaws and a miscast actor, the user enjoyed the movie overall and praised its visuals. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #77 w 0.113 So many visceral scenes…really liked this movie a lot. Having a Clayface/Batman brawl would be absolute cinema. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.421 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.94 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Explicitly says they really liked the movie a lot. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Commenter says they really liked the movie a lot and praises its visceral scenes. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter says they really liked the movie a lot and praises its visceral scenes. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they "really liked this movie a lot" and praises its "visceral scenes". Grok 4.7: positive — Explicitly says they really liked the movie a lot. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They explicitly say they really liked the movie; the visceral scenes are praised, and the imagined brawl is enthusiasm. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter says they really liked the movie a lot and praises its visceral scenes. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter explicitly states they really liked the movie and praises its visceral scenes. | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #78 w 0.113 It's so gooey. Pretty damn good body horror film. As a Batman mega fan, would have loved more references to Gotham City (But I am convinced this is set before Batman's arrival in Gotham City) and a touch more gore but I liked it. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.911 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.86 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Calls it a pretty damn good body horror film and explicitly liked it despite wanting more references and gore. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls it a pretty damn good body horror film and says they liked it, despite minor wishes. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Calls it a pretty damn good body horror film and says 'I liked it', with only minor wishes for more Gotham references and gore. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they liked it and calls it a 'pretty damn good body horror film' despite minor nitpicks. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls it pretty damn good and says they liked it despite wanting more. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls it a pretty good body horror film and explicitly says they liked it, despite wanting more references and gore. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Calls it a pretty damn good body horror film and says 'I liked it' despite wanting more references and gore. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter explicitly states 'Pretty damn good body horror film' and 'I liked it'. | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #79 w 0.112 James Gunn actually confirmed that during this movie bruce is in China currently VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.08 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.87 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Shares information about Bruce's location during the film without judging the movie. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Shares trivia about Bruce's whereabouts per James Gunn; no judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Shares trivia about Bruce Wayne's whereabouts per James Gunn; offers no judgment of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment shares trivia/lore about the universe without expressing an opinion on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Trivia about Bruce's location; no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Shares production or story trivia without expressing an opinion about the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Relays a trivia claim about the film's plot/production with no judgement of the movie's quality. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment shares trivia about the plot and director without judging the film. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #80 w 0.111 Damn Bruce sent to the Guang Dong Tigers VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.402 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.62 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.63 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — A joke about Bruce, with no evaluation of the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Joke about a character's fate; no judgement of the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — A joke or plot remark about Bruce being sent to the Guang Dong Tigers, with no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment is just a joke/meme about a character, offering no opinion on the movie itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Joke or reference with no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A joke or reference with no clear judgment of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Joke about a plot point (Bruce sent to a team, likely a meme reference); no judgement of the film's quality. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Jokes about the plot or unrelated basketball reference, no judgment of the film. | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #81 w 0.11 All the goofy shit he did in the nightclub between the dancing, graphic kills, and random face swaps is completely realistic when you remember he's a theater kid VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.796 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.82 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.40 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Jokes about the character’s nightclub behavior without expressing whether the film was good or bad. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Joke about the character's nightclub antics being theater-kid behavior; no judgment of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Jokes about the character's behavior being in-character as a theater kid; describes scenes without giving an overall judgment of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment makes a joke/observation about a character's behavior without expressing a verdict on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Explains character behavior as realistic; no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They explain the character’s behavior but give no clear opinion of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Joking observation about a scene's content and character; no clear judgement of whether the film is good or recommended. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises the movie's entertaining and characteristic scenes with humor. | − | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | + |
| thread #82 w 0.11 The jump scare while Matt was shapeshifting in bed really got me. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.494 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.43 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Describes a jump scare's effect without expressing an overall opinion of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Says a jump scare effectively scared them, which is implicit praise of the horror's effectiveness. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Describes a scare in a scene and says it got them, but gives no overall judgement or recommendation of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter notes that a jump scare successfully scared them, showing a specific horror element was effective. Grok 4.7: positive — Jump scare landed and affected them; praise of effective horror. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They praise the jump scare as effective, saying it really got them. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — The commenter says a jump scare 'really got me', which reads as praise for the scene's effectiveness, not criticism of the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praising a specific effective scene implies a positive viewing experience. | − | + | + | 0 | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #83 w 0.109 Matt is so charismatic I can see myself rooting for him in the future even though he's a bit of a psycho. VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.55 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.58 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Comments on Matt's charisma and potential future support, without judging the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises the actor's charisma as an appeal; calling the character a psycho isn't film criticism. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Praises the character's charisma and says they'd root for him, but gives no overall verdict on the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter praises the main character's charisma and expresses interest in rooting for him in the future. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Character praise only; no judgement of the film itself. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Praises Matt’s charisma and discusses rooting for the character, but gives no judgment of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment praises a character's charisma and calls him a psycho, but gives no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses a character and actor without judging the film itself. | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #84 w 0.108 I enjoyed the film, but I was surprised at how much it reminded me of Darkman. Also liked the inclusion of The Narrows which was a weird full circle moment. The Narrows were introduced in Batman Begins, integrated into the comics, and are now back in the movies. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.802 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.59 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.62 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Explicitly enjoyed the film and liked the inclusion of The Narrows. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Says they enjoyed the film and liked The Narrows inclusion; the Darkman comparison is an observation, not a criticism. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — States they enjoyed the film and liked the inclusion of The Narrows; the Darkman comparison is an observation, not a criticism. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they enjoyed the film and liked specific lore inclusions. Grok 4.7: positive — Explicitly enjoyed the film and liked The Narrows inclusion. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — The commenter explicitly says they enjoyed the film and liked its inclusion of The Narrows. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Says they enjoyed the film and liked specific elements; comparisons and trivia are supportive, not critical. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter explicitly states they enjoyed the film and liked specific elements. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #85 w 0.108 I loved when he was impersonating that one henchmen at the nightclub and having to act with all the people recognizing him. It's a tiny moment, but that scene where he eats the nuts, and they are like "what are you doing, your nut allergy" and he spits them out was so funny. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.834 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.31 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.88 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Loved the impersonation sequence and praised the nut-allergy gag as very funny. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Commenter loved a specific scene and found it very funny, expressing enjoyment of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter says they loved the nightclub impersonation scene and found the nut allergy moment very funny, expressing enjoyment of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly praises a specific scene in the movie, saying they loved it and found it funny. Grok 4.7: positive — Loved a specific scene and found it funny. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They explicitly loved a funny scene, indicating enjoyment of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter says they loved specific scenes and found one funny; clear enjoyment of the film's moments. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The user expresses clear enjoyment of specific scenes and finds them funny. | + | 0 | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #86 w 0.107 I don't think this movie is scary, but damn that jumpscare in bed where he turn to the old dude got me so bad lol Genuinely didn't expect a jumpscare there lmao VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER -0.018 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.91 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.49 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Describes the film’s scariness and a surprising jumpscare without expressing overall approval or disappointment. Claude Opus 5.5: mixed — Says the movie isn't scary, but enjoyed one effective, unexpected jumpscare; no clear overall lean. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Says it isn't scary overall, but enthusiastically praises a jumpscare that got them; no real criticism of the film, leaning favorable. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Discusses a specific jumpscare reaction and notes the movie isn't scary, without giving an overall verdict on the film. Grok 4.7: mixed — Says the movie isn’t scary, but praises one effective jumpscare. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): mixed — They say the movie isn’t scary, but praise a jumpscare that startled them. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Says the film isn't scary but the jumpscare 'got me so bad' and they laughed at the surprise; enjoyment of the scare leans positive. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises a specific effective scene ("got me so bad lol") despite not finding it scary. | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | + |
| thread #87 w 0.107 I don't think the movie was anything too stand out, all told. But I did enjoy it and would take more comic book movies that take more of a genre swing like this over the more homogeneous ones we've been getting lately. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.82 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.87 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.67 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Despite finding it unexceptional, they enjoyed it and prefer its genre experimentation to more homogeneous comic book movies. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Says it wasn't standout but enjoyed it and welcomes this genre approach; leans positive overall. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Says it wasn't standout but enjoyed it and wants more genre-swinging comic book movies like it; leans positive overall. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they enjoyed the movie and appreciated its unique genre approach despite it not standing out. Grok 4.7: positive — Not standout, but they enjoyed it and want more like it. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Despite finding it unremarkable, they enjoyed it and prefer its genre swing to more homogeneous comic book movies. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Not standout, but they enjoyed it and want more genre-swing comic movies like it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter states they 'did enjoy it' and prefer it over other comic book movies. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #88 w 0.106 Closeup of his hairy eyelids in the airplane bathroom did it for me VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.57 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.42 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Mentions a memorable closeup and personal reaction without clearly judging the film's quality. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — 'Did it for me' suggests the gross body-horror closeup worked for them. Ambiguous, but it leans toward praise. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Mentions a specific scene detail (eyelids in airplane bathroom) 'did it for me', but it's ambiguous whether praise of body horror or disgust; no clear verdict. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Saying a specific gross/creepy detail 'did it for me' expresses appreciation for the film's horror/body-horror execution. Grok 4.7: positive — Gross eyelid closeup 'did it for me' — that moment sold them. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — “Did it for me” signals that the eyelid closeup was a satisfying or effective moment for the commenter. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter says a specific closeup 'did it for me', signaling enjoyment of that moment, which reads as praise of the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter describes a repulsive or disappointing moment that ruined the film for them. | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | − |
| thread #89 w 0.105 The club scene - so fucking good VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.538 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.98 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.41 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Enthusiastically praises the club scene as very good. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Enthusiastic praise of the club scene; it expresses enjoyment of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Enthusiastic praise of a specific scene (the club scene) as 'so fucking good', indicating a favorable view of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter strongly praises a specific scene from the movie. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises the club scene as excellent. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Strong praise for a scene in the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Enthusiastically praises a specific scene as 'so fucking good', signaling approval of the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praising a specific scene as 'so fucking good' indicates a positive verdict on the film. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #90 w 0.105 Just got outta a mostly-packed Clayface screening. I absolutely, positively loved it. First and foremost, this is a body horror movie. People in my screening had their heads in their hands during some of the more graphic sequences. Would not be surprised if it was nominated for… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.959 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.98 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Explicitly loved the film, praising its effects, acting, story, creative horror, and memorable kills. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Absolutely loved it; praises makeup, effects, acting, gnarly deaths; thinks it deserves a higher score. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Says they absolutely loved it, praising the body horror, effects, story and acting, and wonders why its critics/audience score isn't higher. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they loved the film, praising the effects, story, acting, and body horror elements. Grok 4.7: positive — Loved it; praises horror, effects, story, acting, and deaths. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They explicitly loved the movie, praised its story, acting, effects, and creative, memorable death scenes. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter 'absolutely, positively loved it,' praises effects, acting, story, and recommends it as a sleeper hit. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter explicitly states they 'absolutely, positively loved it' and praises the SFX, story, and acting. | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #91 w 0.104 I’m just wondering how Batman is supposed to fight this guy. He’s almost immortal. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.225 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.02 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.85 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Speculates about Batman fighting Clayface without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Speculative question about how Batman could fight the villain; no judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Speculation about how Batman could fight Clayface; no judgment of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — In-universe character and power-scaling speculation with no opinion expressed on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot speculation about fighting Clayface; no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Speculates about how Batman could fight Clayface; gives no opinion on the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Speculates about plot/character logic (how Batman fights Clayface) without judging the film's quality or recommending it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter is only discussing plot mechanics and how Batman would fight the character, expressing no opinion on the film. | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #92 w 0.104 As shown in various Batman media over the years, he's weak to freezing, fire and electricity. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.691 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.25 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.53 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Discusses the character's weaknesses across Batman media without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Trivia about Clayface's weaknesses in Batman media; no judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment states trivia about the character's weaknesses across Batman media, with no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment shares character lore and trivia without expressing any opinion on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Trivia about Clayface weaknesses, no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — This is trivia about the character’s weaknesses, not a judgment of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment states trivia about Clayface's weaknesses across Batman media; no judgement of this film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment only discusses character lore and weaknesses, expressing no opinion on the film itself. | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #93 w 0.103 Clayface a shitty bug Pokémon. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.557 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.81 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.67 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — A joke comparing Clayface to a Pokémon, without judging the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — A joke comparing the name or character to a Pokémon, with no judgement of the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — A joke comparing the character Clayface to a bad bug Pokémon; it doesn't express a clear verdict on the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment makes a joke about the name/character without expressing a verdict on a film. Grok 4.7: negative — Calls Clayface shitty, a clear dismissive insult. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A joke comparing Clayface to a Pokémon, with no clear judgment of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Calls the film's titular character a 'shitty bug Pokémon,' an insult expressing clear dislike of the movie's concept and execution. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Calls the subject a 'shitty bug Pokémon', expressing a clear negative opinion. | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | − | − |
| thread #94 w 0.103 When he got tased it seemed to have fucked him up, they briefly hinted at it early in the movie when the doctor says the nano machines react to electrical impulses VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.66 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.38 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.42 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Explains a plot detail about electrical impulses without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Plot observation about tasing and nanomachines; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Plot discussion explaining a story detail (tasing and nanomachines) without any judgment of the film's quality. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Pure plot discussion regarding in-universe mechanics with no opinion expressed on the movie's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot explanation of a scene, no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses a plot detail about the character's reaction to electricity, without evaluating the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Plot observation about a taser scene and a plot detail; no judgement of the film's quality expressed. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter is discussing a plot point and detail about the movie without expressing a judgment. | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #95 w 0.102 One thing I’m Picking up on was how much of this movie was anti AI/ a warning for anybody close to ai psychosis. Matt Hagen effectively down on his luck tries out a new technology and slowly becomes dependent on it over the course of the film. By the end of it the metaphor kind… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.846 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.89 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): positive — NLI p=0.88 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — After analyzing the film’s AI themes, the commenter explicitly states, “I loved it.” Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Mostly thematic analysis of the AI metaphor, ending with an explicit 'I loved it'. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter analyzes the film's themes approvingly and explicitly ends with 'I loved it'. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter analyzes the film's themes and explicitly concludes with 'I loved it'. Grok 4.7: positive — Detailed thematic analysis ending with explicit praise: they loved it. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — The commenter explicitly says, “I loved it.” Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter interprets the film's themes in depth and explicitly ends with "I loved it." Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter provides a thematic breakdown of the film and concludes with 'I loved it'. | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #96 w 0.102 Falling in love with Gotham City women is a dangerous thing 😳 VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.128 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.61 P(pos)=0.05 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.48 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Jokes about Gotham City women without expressing an opinion on the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Joke about the plot or characters; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — A joking remark about the plot or theme, with no judgement of the film's quality or any recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment makes a joke about a plot trope in the Gotham setting without judging the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Joke about Gotham romance, no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A playful comment about Gotham City women, with no judgment of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Joke about Gotham women being dangerous; no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Plot or character related quote/comment without any judgment of the film. | + | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #97 w 0.101 I want to take his face... off VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.077 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.87 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.55 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — A movie quote or joke without any judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — A joke quoting Face/Off; it offers no judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — A quip or quote referencing the film's premise, with no judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment is just a joke quoting the movie Face/Off, with no opinion on Clayface. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Joke referencing the character, no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A quote or joke without an opinion about the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Joking, ambiguous line about the character's face; no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Quoting a famous movie line without expressing an opinion on the film. | + | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #98 w 0.101 I wish him molding his body into a weapon wasn’t relegated to the shadows but I had a good time with this one. I felt a little more sad for Matt Hagen than Arthur Fleck but realized I probably shouldn’t. Tom Rhys Harries is really great. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.792 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.75 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.60 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — They had a good time and praise Tom Rhys Harries, despite wishing the body-weapon transformations were more visible. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Minor complaint about shadowed effects, but had a good time and praises lead actor. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Says they had a good time and praises the lead performance; the minor complaint about hidden action doesn't outweigh the overall enjoyment. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they had a good time and praises the lead actor's performance despite a minor critique. Grok 4.7: positive — Minor creative wish, but overall had a good time and praised the lead. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They had a good time and praise the lead performance, despite wishing one element had been shown more clearly. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Says 'I had a good time with this one' and praises the lead actor, with only a minor wish about the body-morphing being underused. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Despite a minor complaint, the user explicitly states they 'had a good time with this one' and praises the acting. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #99 w 0.1 I enjoyed it, I wish the movie had a bigger budget so we could get some more shots of clayface, however they did good with what they had, there was only one scene I can remember that the cgi looked bad. Tom Rhys Harris did great, I can wait to see more of him. One thing I don’t… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.906 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.90 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.77 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Explicitly enjoyed it, praising the performance and effects despite budget limitations and disliking the AI-skin change. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Enjoyed it, praised lead actor and handling of budget; minor complaints about CGI and skin change. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Says they enjoyed it and praised the lead performance; the budget, CGI and AI-skin complaints are minor and don't change the overall lean. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they enjoyed the movie and praises the lead actor and production despite minor flaws. Grok 4.7: positive — Enjoyed it overall; minor CGI and design complaints don't outweigh praise. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They enjoyed the movie and praise the performance, despite some CGI and story-choice criticisms. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.906 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter states "I enjoyed it" and praises the acting and overall execution despite minor budget and CGI flaws. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |