Klara and the Sun
← all movies. Each comment's label under every pathway (+ positive, − negative, 0 neutral / mixed / no verdict; hover a cell for the verdict).
Pick a pathway to show its verdict and rationale under every comment: VADER (old v1) · siebert+opinion (previous live) · Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large) · GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE) · Claude Opus 5.5 · Claude Sonnet 5.5 · Gemini 4 Argon · Grok 4.7 · GPT-6 Luna (cheap) · Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap) · Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap)
| comment (excerpt ≤280 chars) | VADER (old v1) | siebert+opinion (previous live) | Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large) | GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE) | Claude Opus 5.5 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Gemini 4 Argon | Grok 4.7 | GPT-6 Luna (cheap) | Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap) | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank · score · bucket · Reddit · comments +/0/− | #12 52 Skip R 67 63/9/29 | #15 28 Skip R 27 27/25/49 | #15 12 Skip R 0 0/60/41 | #15 25 Skip R 22 14/58/29 | #15 29 Skip R 29 15/60/26 | #15 27 Skip R 26 12/63/26 | #15 29 Skip R 28 15/61/25 | #15 28 Skip R 27 15/57/29 | #15 24 Skip R 20 14/55/32 | #15 28 Skip R 28 15/59/27 | #15 22 Skip R 18 12/56/33 |
| thread #0 w 1.0 I didn’t love the book, but I HATED this movie. The book was annoyingly ambiguous and meandering, whereas the movie was on the nose and hyper-quick to resolve plot points. The central storyline of Klara as Josie’s replacement only gets about 15 minutes to marinate before… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.9 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.99 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Explicitly hated the movie, criticizing pacing, omissions, and shallow themes; Ortega’s performance was its only redeeming feature. Rated 3/10. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Says they hated the movie, criticizes rushed plot, cuts, and director; only Ortega redeemable; 3/10. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Says they HATED the movie, criticizes pacing, cuts and direction, gives 3/10; only Jenna Ortega's performance is praised. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter explicitly states they hated the movie, criticizes the pacing and cuts, and rates it 3/10. Grok 4.7: negative — Hated the movie overall, scoring it 3/10 despite a few liked elements. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They strongly dislike the movie overall, calling it a failure and rating it 3/10, despite praising Jenna Ortega’s performance. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Says they HATED the movie, criticizes its writing and cuts, rates it 3/10; only praises Ortega's performance. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The user explicitly states they HATED this movie, gives it a 3/10, and criticizes almost every aspect. | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #1 w 0.707 Agreed on Ortega, she's easily the best thing about this movie and the only one working way above this mess of a script VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.703 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.68 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Praises Ortega but calls the script a mess, indicating an overall negative assessment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Praises Ortega's performance but calls the script a mess; the overall verdict on the film is negative. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Praises Ortega's performance but calls the script a 'mess'; the overall verdict on the film leans negative. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — Praises one actor's performance, but dismisses the rest of the film as having a 'mess of a script'. Grok 4.7: negative — Praises one actress but calls the script a mess overall. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — Praises Ortega but calls the script a mess and implies she is the film’s only redeeming element. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Praises the lead actress but calls the film a 'mess of a script,' a clear criticism of the film overall. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Calls the script a 'mess' despite praising Jenna Ortega. | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #2 w 0.577 One of the interesting parts of the book was the idea of Klara somehow being right about what would heal Josie, even if her reasons behind being right were odd, and that humans were weirded out by AFs being right about things to the point of decommissioning them. If they… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.458 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.47 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.47 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Hasn't seen the film; expresses conditional disappointment about a possible change to the book's premise. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses the book and a hypothetical change; hasn't seen the film, so no judgement of it. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter discusses the book's premise and worries about changes; they haven't seen the film and give no verdict on it. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter has not seen the film and is speculating about changes from the book. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Discusses the book and a possible change; hasn't judged the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They express a conditional concern about a possible adaptation change, not a verdict on the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — VADER -0.458 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter expresses disappointment about a potential plot change and might skip the film. | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | − |
| thread #3 w 0.5 Completely gone. The movie makes it clear that her belief in the sun is naive and delusional. The book makes it seem possible that the sun did cure her and it’s beyond our comprehension… that thread is completely gone. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.128 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.97 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.91 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Criticizes the film for eliminating the book’s ambiguity about the sun’s healing power. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Describes how the film drops the book's ambiguity about the sun, without explicitly judging the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses a difference between the film and the book regarding the sun's role; describes a change without clearly judging the film's quality. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — Criticizes the adaptation for completely removing the book's nuanced ambiguity regarding Klara's belief in the sun. Grok 4.7: negative — Criticizes the film for flattening the book's ambiguity and losing that thread. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They criticize the movie for removing the book’s ambiguity about whether the sun helped her. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — VADER 0.128 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Criticizes the film for removing a key thematic element present in the book. | + | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | − | − | − | 0 | − |
| thread #4 w 0.447 What? I must’ve interpreted the ending completely differently then. When do we find out Josie is dead? Klara is an unreliable narrator after she loses her PEC-9. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.394 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.40 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.42 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Discusses interpretation of the ending and narrator reliability without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses interpretation of the ending and narrator reliability; gives no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses ending interpretation and plot details without expressing any judgment of the film's quality. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment only discusses plot interpretation and character theories without expressing an opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot interpretation question only; no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses an interpretation of the ending and narrator reliability, without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses plot interpretation and the ending's narration without expressing any judgement of whether they liked the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter is discussing plot interpretation and theories without expressing a verdict on the film. | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #5 w 0.408 There’s just no other explanation for where else she could be. Store manager calls out that Klara is being unreliable by saying Josie just had to go and she never saw her again. I think Klara hallucinating her at the end is the final confirmation of her being dead. I guess it’s… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.141 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.68 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.55 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Discusses plot interpretation and a character’s possible death without evaluating the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Plot interpretation about Josie's fate; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter discusses a plot theory about Josie's fate and Klara's reliability without giving any judgement of the film's quality. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Pure plot discussion and theorizing about the ending without expressing an opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot theory about a character's fate; no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses an interpretation of the plot, without expressing an opinion on the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Plot theorizing about Josie's fate and Klara's reliability; no judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses plot theories about the fate of the characters without judging the film. | + | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #6 w 0.378 Klara’s memory is all jumbled up because she loses her PEC-9 sacrificing herself to try to save Josie, just like in the book. The idea of her capabilities slowly fading after her sacrifice is explored in the movie as she recounts the aftermath of everything. We see her breaking… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.485 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.02 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.87 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Explains plot events and interprets the ending without judging the film’s quality. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Plot interpretation and book comparison without any judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment explains plot details and interpretation of the ending and compares to the book, without judging the film's quality. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Pure plot discussion and comparison to the book with no judgment on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot and book comparison only; no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses plot details and interpretation without expressing an opinion about the film’s quality or recommending it. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Explains plot events and interpretation of the ending and comparison to the book, with no judgement of the film's quality. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses plot points, book comparisons, and character arcs without expressing a personal verdict on the film. | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #7 w 0.354 The book makes it sound like AFs were ALWAYS meant to be disposable when the kids go off to college. Klara just dies faster due to her sacrifice. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.361 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.93 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.47 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Discusses the book’s plot and Klara’s fate without evaluating the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses book lore about AFs being disposable; no judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses plot and book themes about AFs being disposable; offers no judgement of the film's quality. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Discusses plot details from the book without expressing an opinion on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot comparison to the book; no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses the book’s premise and Klara’s fate without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses the book's plot and Klara's fate without expressing any judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment only discusses plot details and book lore without expressing an opinion on the film. | + | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #8 w 0.333 I don’t think the book ever implies that the sun “healed” her. That’s just what Klara believed because she understands the world through her own lens from an ego-centric point of view, much like a human child still learning about the world. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.361 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.19 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.73 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Discusses the book’s interpretation and Klara’s perspective without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Interpretive discussion of the book's meaning; no judgement of the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Interpretive discussion of the book's themes and Klara's perspective, with no judgement of whether the film is good or recommended. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment only discusses the plot of the source book with no evaluation of the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Book interpretation only; no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses the book’s meaning, without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Interpretive discussion of the book's plot and character perspective; no judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses plot interpretation and themes without expressing a judgment or verdict on the film. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #9 w 0.316 Actually that was one of a few things I did like about the movie. Kind of mirrors the mother’s idea of saving her daughter, showing how when we love and grieve we have whimsical ideas of how we can do anything. I was quite surprised that Josie survived in the book, felt a bit… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.827 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.96 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.87 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Calling this one of few things they liked implies an overall unfavorable view of the movie. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Calling it 'one of a few things I did like' implies overall dislike, despite praising one element. Claude Sonnet 5.5: mixed — Says they liked one aspect of the movie, but the overall verdict on the film isn't clear; the criticism is of the book's ending. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — "One of a few things I did like" implies the commenter disliked most of the movie overall. Grok 4.7: negative — Liked only a few things, implying overall disappointment with the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — Calling it one of only a few things they liked implies overall disappointment with the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): mixed — VADER 0.827 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter states it was 'one of a few things I did like about the movie'. | + | + | 0 | − | − | 0 | − | − | − | 0 | + |
| thread #10 w 0.302 This was what the trailer seemed like so I'm staying away and it seems like a good call. The tone of this is the opposite of the book, where it plays a very important part. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.875 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.98 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.66 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Hasn't seen the film; avoidance and tonal concerns are based on the trailer and comparison with the book. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter hasn't seen the film; their concern about tone is based only on the trailer and the book. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Commenter hasn't clearly watched it but is avoiding it based on the trailer and says its tone is the opposite of the book, a criticism of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter states they are staying away and have not seen the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Has not seen the film; avoiding it based on the trailer. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They say they are staying away and that the trailer confirms it was a good call, criticizing its tone. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Commenter avoids the film based on the trailer and says its tone contradicts the book, a judgement against it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — User is avoiding the film and criticizes its tone compared to the book. | + | − | − | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | − | − | − |
| thread #11 w 0.289 I really don’t understand why they changed the replacement Josie storyline. Like why on gods green earth’s did they make the choice to have the mom be anti-Klara for the majority of the movie? In the book, at least you have this mystery of what the f is wrong with this family… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.593 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.96 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Criticizes adaptation choices for making the storyline obvious and losing the book’s mystery. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Criticizes the film's adaptation choices for making the plot obvious and losing the book's mystery. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Criticizes the film's adaptation choices, saying they lose the book's mystery and make the plot too obvious. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — Criticizes the movie's storyline changes from the book, stating it completely loses the mystery and becomes too obvious. Grok 4.7: negative — Criticizes adaptation choices that make the story obvious and lose the book's mystery. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They criticize the film’s storyline changes for removing the book’s mystery and making the plot too obvious. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — VADER -0.593 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter criticizes the film's adaptation choices, plot changes, and lack of mystery compared to the book. | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #12 w 0.277 Didn’t he cast himself as something and then cut his scene? There is hope! VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.271 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.12 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.72 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Jokes about the filmmaker cutting his own scene, without judging the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Joke or trivia about someone cutting their own scene; no judgement of the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment is about trivia or casting and a cut scene; it gives no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment discusses behind-the-scenes trivia about the director before seeing the film, offering no verdict on the movie itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Trivia about casting and a cut scene, no film judgment. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Jokes about the director cutting his own scene; gives no opinion on the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Asks a trivia question about casting and a cut scene; no judgement of the film's quality expressed. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses behind-the-scenes trivia and casting without judging the film itself. | + | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #13 w 0.267 Imagining Taika as the sun really cracked me up VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.26 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.45 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Amusement at imagining Taika as the sun, without judging the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Joke about imagining Taika Waititi as the sun; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — A joke about imagining Taika Waititi as the sun; amusing but gives no judgment of the film's quality. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment makes a joke about the director without expressing an opinion on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Joke about casting, no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Jokes about imagining Taika as the sun, without judging the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — A joke about casting imagery; it gives no judgement of the film's quality or whether they'd recommend it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter is making a joke about casting without giving a verdict on the film. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #14 w 0.258 Thank god he’ll probably never get to fuck up AKIRA at this point VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.754 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.97 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.61 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Criticizes the filmmaker’s potential handling of AKIRA without judging this film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Criticises the director over a possible Akira project; gives no explicit judgement of this film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment is about a director's possible Akira adaptation, not a judgement of Klara and the Sun itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment criticizes the director regarding a different potential project without giving a verdict on this film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — About a director and AKIRA, not a judgment of this film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — The comment criticizes the prospect of an AKIRA adaptation, not Klara and the Sun itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment is about the director's future projects (Akira), not a judgement of Klara and the Sun itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter expresses relief that the director cannot 'fuck up' another movie. | + | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | − |
| thread #15 w 0.25 I can’t recall a director having lost his sauce as badly as Waititi Jojo Rabbit balanced the comedic and comedic elements perfectly and Thor Ragnorok made the franchise truly exciting for the first time ever Now all I’m hearing about is his duds VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.883 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.54 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Criticizes Waititi’s career based on hearsay, without directly judging this film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses Waititi's career and other films; no judgement of Klara and the Sun itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment criticizes Waititi's recent career trajectory, not Klara and the Sun (not even his film); no verdict on this film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter discusses the director's reputation and past work, implying they haven't seen this film yet. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Discusses Waititi’s other films and decline, not this movie. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They criticize Waititi’s recent work generally but don’t give an opinion on Klara and the Sun. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses the director's past work and reputation rather than giving a clear verdict on Klara and the Sun itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses the director's career and other films, but does not express a verdict on Klara and the Sun. | + | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #16 w 0.243 Cause he had his producer wife reining him in so the theory goes VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.51 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.32 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Discusses a theory about producer influence without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Speculative behind-the-scenes theory about the director and his producer wife; no judgement of the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment offers a theory about someone being reined in by a producer wife; no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Discusses a theory about the director and producer without expressing a verdict on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Production theory about the director, no film judgment. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Speculates about the director's producer wife without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Speculation about the director's production circumstances; no judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses behind-the-scenes film theory without giving a verdict on the movie itself. | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #17 w 0.236 Zemekis is the only other one I think has lost the sauce as much and as quick. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.318 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.81 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Criticizes a director’s career decline without expressing a verdict on this film. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Implies this film's director has 'lost the sauce,' an implicit criticism of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment criticizes a director's decline (Zemeckis comparison) without giving a verdict on Klara and the Sun itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment criticizes the director's general career trajectory without offering a verdict on this specific film. Grok 4.7: negative — Implies the director lost their talent as badly as Zemeckis. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — Calling the director washed up implies strong disappointment with the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Says Zemeckis has lost his touch 'as much and as quick,' implying the director's recent work is poor, which reads as criticism of this film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter states the director has lost his talent, which is a clear negative film criticism. | − | − | − | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | − | − | − | − |
| thread #18 w 0.229 Shades of M Night Shyamalan. Dude was toured as the next Spielberg and went straight to shit after that VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.402 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.98 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.99 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Criticizes Shyamalan’s career without clearly judging Klara and the Sun. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Comments on a director's career decline via a Shyamalan comparison; no explicit judgement of this film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Compares the film to M. Night Shyamalan and comments on his career, but gives no clear judgment of Klara and the Sun itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment criticizes a director's career trajectory without offering a verdict on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Compares style to Shyamalan and criticizes his career, not this film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — It comments on Shyamalan’s career and makes a comparison, without judging this film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Compares the film's director unfavorably to Shyamalan and says his career went downhill, implying disappointment with this film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter criticizes the director's career trajectory, stating it went 'straight to shit'. | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | − | − |
| thread #19 w 0.224 Well, there is the guy that made the Dragon Ball Evolution movie. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.273 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.27 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.41 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Mentions a filmmaker's previous movie without judging Klara and the Sun. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Comment mentions a filmmaker's other work without judging this film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment only notes a trivia/credit-style fact about someone involved, with no stated judgement of Klara and the Sun itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment makes a remark about another director/film and offers no verdict on Klara and the Sun. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Joke about a filmmaker's prior movie, no judgment of this film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Mentions a filmmaker’s past work without expressing an opinion about this film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment only notes the director's prior film, with no judgement of Klara and the Sun itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Mentioning the director's past work without expressing an opinion on this film. | + | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #20 w 0.218 I forgot that was going to be a thing, I could easily see Shotaro making stupid quips about Tetsuo when he's in his gigantic phase. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.25 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.34 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.71 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Speculates about character dialogue without expressing any judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Joke about characters, apparently Akira-related; no judgement of the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — The comment is a joke about Akira characters (Shotaro, Tetsuo) and gives no judgement of Klara and the Sun. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment makes a joke about a hypothetical adaptation of Akira without expressing a verdict on Klara and the Sun. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Speculative character joke, no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Speculates about a character making quips; gives no opinion on the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Speculative joke about a different franchise's characters; no judgement of Klara and the Sun itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses characters and theories unrelated to the film's quality. | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #21 w 0.213 Tetsuo referencing outdated memes from 2021 throughout the entire movie VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.23 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.71 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Describes a character referencing memes without clearly judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Joke observation about a character's dialogue, with no clear judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — The comment is a joke about 'Tetsuo' and outdated memes, with no clear judgment of the film. It reads as non-sequitur humor. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment makes a joke/observation about a character without giving an actual verdict on the movie. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Joke about a character's outdated meme references, no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A joke or observation about meme references, with no clear judgment of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — A joke about dated memes in the film; it doesn't state whether the commenter liked or recommends the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment makes a joke about a character without expressing a verdict on the film. | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #22 w 0.209 Waititi was tapped to do a live action Akira? What a nightmare VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.98 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Criticizes Waititi directing a prospective Akira adaptation, not Klara and the Sun. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Comments on Waititi's rumored Akira project, not a judgement of Klara and the Sun. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment is about Waititi's rumored Akira adaptation, not a judgment of Klara and the Sun itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment is about the director's involvement in another project (Akira) and does not mention Klara and the Sun. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Comment is about Waititi and Akira, not this film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on Waititi directing a live-action Akira, not on Klara and the Sun. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses a different project (live-action Akira) and its casting, not a judgement of Klara and the Sun itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses an entirely different unreleased movie project, not Klara and the Sun. | 0 | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #23 w 0.204 Almost everyone in Hollywood has been linked to an Akira remake at some point. It's a running joke. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.296 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.08 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.59 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Discusses Hollywood casting rumors about an Akira remake, without judging Klara and the Sun. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Comment jokes about Hollywood's Akira remake attempts; no judgement of this film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment is about Akira remake rumors in Hollywood, unrelated to any judgement of Klara and the Sun. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment discusses trivia about an unrelated Akira remake and does not express an opinion on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Talks about Akira remakes, not this film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A joke about Hollywood and an Akira remake; it gives no opinion on Klara and the Sun. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment is about Hollywood Akira remake gossip, with no judgement of Klara and the Sun itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses a running joke about a different movie remake, not the film itself. | + | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #24 w 0.2 I remember there was a synopsis for it that just doesnt even sound like Akira. Kaneda being a bar owner and brother to unstable gang leader Tetsuo... what? I'm all for differences in adaptations, but that is just so far off the mark lol VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.339 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.28 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.72 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Criticises an Akira adaptation synopsis, not Klara and the Sun itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Comment discusses an Akira adaptation synopsis, not Klara and the Sun; no judgement of this film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — The comment discusses a synopsis of an Akira adaptation, not Klara and the Sun, and gives no verdict on this film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Discusses an unmade adaptation of a completely different movie (Akira), offering no verdict on Klara and the Sun. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Discusses an Akira adaptation synopsis, not this film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses an adaptation synopsis being inaccurate, without judging the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — VADER 0.339 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Criticizes the adaptation changes as being too far off the mark. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | − |
| thread #25 w 0.196 Can someone, (anyone?) other than Taika remake this movie please. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.318 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.39 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.79 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Asking someone other than Taika to remake the film implies dissatisfaction with this version. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Asking for a remake by another director implies dissatisfaction with this film's execution. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Asking for someone else to remake the film implies dissatisfaction with the current version, though no specific criticism is given. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter dislikes Taika Waititi's direction of the film so much that they want someone else to remake it. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Director preference for a remake, no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — Requesting a remake implies dissatisfaction with this version of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — The commenter wants someone other than Taika Waititi to remake it, implying dissatisfaction with his version of the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter wants a different director to remake the movie, implying they dislike the current adaptation. | + | 0 | − | − | − | − | − | 0 | − | − | − |
| thread #26 w 0.192 what happened to him? I remember hearing his ex-wife would help him with the writing process. Is this another George Lucas situation? The talent was hers all along? VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.722 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.02 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.69 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Speculates about the filmmaker’s writing talent and ex-wife’s contributions without judging the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Speculates about the creator's career and his ex-wife's role; gives no judgement of the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Speculates about the author's writing process and an ex-wife's contribution; no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Speculation about the director's personal life and writing process without an explicit verdict on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Speculates about the writer's process, not the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Asks about the writer and his ex-wife; offers no judgment of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Asks about the author's writing process and ex-wife's role; no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses the writer's personal life and career rumors without evaluating the film. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #27 w 0.189 I don't think he's untalented by any means, he just needs help shaping and condensing. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.402 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.87 P(pos)=0.02 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.39 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Comments on a filmmaker's talent and need for guidance without explicitly judging this film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Comments on the creator's talent and need for editing; no explicit judgement of this film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment discusses the author/director's talent and editing needs, not a clear verdict on the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment discusses a person's general talent and weaknesses without giving a verdict on this specific film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Comment critiques a person's craft, not the film itself. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on someone's need for help shaping and condensing, without judging the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses a person's talent and editing needs, not a judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses the director or writer's general talent and editing needs without judging the film itself. | + | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #28 w 0.186 An elephant in the room that was never addressed: Taika was the guy who remade The Inbetweeners for MTV. A great example of his failings js the scene where the lads were playing frisbee. In the original, Will suddenly hits a kid with cerebral palsy in the face and makes him… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.888 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.89 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.98 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Criticises Taika's work on The Inbetweeners, not Klara and the Sun. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Criticizes Taika's work on a different show; no judgement of Klara and the Sun itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment criticizes a director (apparently misattributed) and an unrelated show's remake; it gives no judgement of Klara and the Sun itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Criticizes the director's past work on The Inbetweeners remake without mentioning or judging Klara and the Sun. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Critiques Taika's Inbetweeners remake, not this film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Criticizes Taika's handling of a scene in The Inbetweeners remake, not Klara and the Sun. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — VADER -0.888 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses Taika Waititi's past work and comedy style, not the film Klara and the Sun. | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #29 w 0.183 Holy shit HE was responsible for the US remake? VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.318 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.43 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.51 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Expresses surprise about someone's involvement in a remake, without judging this film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Surprised reaction about someone's involvement in a remake; no judgement of the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Expresses surprise about someone's involvement in a remake; no judgment of Klara and the Sun itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment expresses surprise about trivia regarding a director/creator and does not judge the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Trivia about who made the remake, no film judgment. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Expresses surprise about who was responsible for the remake, without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Expresses surprise about a trivia fact (who made a US remake) without any judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Expresses surprise about a director's involvement without judging the film itself. | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #30 w 0.18 He directed a few episodes, but wasn't the showrunner or credited as a producer, so I'm a little hesitant to be hard on him for any major decisions that series had made. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.15 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.13 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.34 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Discusses the director’s responsibility for a television series, without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses director's role on a different series; no judgement of this film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses a director's involvement in a series and responsibility for decisions; gives no judgement of Klara and the Sun itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment discusses a director's previous television work rather than giving a verdict on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Discusses a director's credits, not a judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses the director’s responsibility for a series, without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses a director's role on a different series, not a judgement of Klara and the Sun itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses a director's involvement in a TV series without judging the movie Klara and the Sun. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #31 w 0.177 He desperately needs someone who can reign him in and tell him no when necessary. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.586 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.05 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.35 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Criticizes an unspecified person's need for restraint without expressing a verdict on the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Comment on a person's need for restraint; no judgement of the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment is about a character's needs, not a judgement of the film itself; no stated opinion on quality. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — General comment about the director's style without judging the unreleased film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — No film judgment; remark about someone needing restraint. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on a character’s needs without evaluating the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment comments on a character's need for guidance; no judgement of the film itself is expressed. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses a character dynamic without expressing a verdict on the film itself. | − | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #32 w 0.174 People also forget that A New Hope was co-written by the uncredited Gloria Katz and Willard Huyck, who have been accredited the better jokes and Han Solo's characterisation. And of course Lawrence Kasdan on Empire and Jedi. If I remember right, the only one Lucas actually wrote… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.178 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.05 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.90 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Discusses Star Wars screenwriting credits without judging Klara and the Sun. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Trivia about Star Wars screenwriting credits; no judgement of Klara and the Sun. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment discusses Star Wars screenwriting trivia and says nothing about Klara and the Sun or any judgement of it. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment is entirely about Star Wars trivia and does not mention or evaluate Klara and the Sun. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Discusses Star Wars writing credits, not this film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses Star Wars screenwriting credits, with no judgment of Klara and the Sun. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses Star Wars screenwriting credits and trivia, with no judgement of Klara and the Sun itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses Star Wars writers, unrelated to Klara and the Sun or its quality. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #33 w 0.171 A New Hope is such an accident. Fisher and Ford both told him on set, I ain't reading this shit. They changed a ton of the dialogue. Spielberg and De Palma telling him his first cut was shit and he should change a ton. Cut all the "world building shit" and just do an opening… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.941 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.90 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Discusses George Lucas and Star Wars collaborators, without judging Klara and the Sun. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses Star Wars production history and Lucas; no judgement of Klara and the Sun. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment discusses Star Wars production history and Lucas, not Klara and the Sun; no verdict on this film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment is entirely about George Lucas and Star Wars, not the movie Klara and the Sun. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Discusses Star Wars and Lucas, not this film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses George Lucas and Star Wars, with no judgment of Klara and the Sun. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses Star Wars production history and Lucas's collaborators; says nothing about Klara and the Sun itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses Star Wars history and George Lucas, unrelated to Klara and the Sun. | + | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #34 w 0.169 “We have Bicentennial Man at home!” Bicentennial Man at home… VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.09 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.67 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — The meme dismisses the film as an inferior knockoff of Bicentennial Man. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — The 'we have X at home' meme mocks the film as an inferior knockoff of Bicentennial Man. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Dismissive joke comparing the film to Bicentennial Man as a cheap knockoff, implying it's derivative, though no explicit verdict is given. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The 'we have X at home' meme format mocks the film as an inferior copy of Bicentennial Man. Grok 4.7: negative — Meme frames the film as an inferior Bicentennial Man knockoff. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — The joke dismisses the film as an inferior, watered-down version of Bicentennial Man. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment is a joke referencing another film, with no judgement of Klara and the Sun itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Dismissive joke comparing the film unfavorably to another movie. | 0 | 0 | 0 | − | − | − | − | − | − | 0 | − |
| thread #35 w 0.167 I mean I love Bicentennial man and that was panned too. I quite liked this movie for a Friday night watch, it’s not a masterpiece but I enjoyed it for what it was. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.785 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.95 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.91 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — They liked the movie and enjoyed it as a Friday night watch, despite not considering it a masterpiece. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Commenter quite liked and enjoyed the film despite admitting it's not a masterpiece; leans positive overall. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter says they quite liked the film and enjoyed it for what it was, despite acknowledging it's not a masterpiece. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they liked and enjoyed the movie despite acknowledging it is not a masterpiece. Grok 4.7: positive — Liked it as a Friday-night watch despite not being a masterpiece. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They say they quite liked and enjoyed the movie, despite noting it is not a masterpiece. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter quite liked the film, enjoyed it for what it was, though acknowledges it isn't a masterpiece. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter states they quite liked the movie and enjoyed it for what it was. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #36 w 0.164 I havent watched this movie yet but I also love Bicentennial Man and I'm so glad to find the other person who likes it as well VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.961 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.44 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.54 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — They haven't watched this film; their praise is for Bicentennial Man. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter hasn't watched the film; praise is for Bicentennial Man, not this movie. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter hasn't seen Klara and the Sun; they only praise a different film, Bicentennial Man, so there is no verdict on this film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter explicitly states they have not watched the movie yet. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Has not watched the movie yet. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They explicitly haven't watched the movie; their praise is for Bicentennial Man. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Commenter hasn't seen Klara and the Sun and only mentions liking a different film, Bicentennial Man. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter states they have not watched the movie yet. | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #37 w 0.162 This is the harshest comment yet. Bicentennial man is probably the worst movie I've ever seen VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.84 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=1.00 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Criticizes Bicentennial Man, not Klara and the Sun; offers no direct verdict on the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Criticizes Bicentennial Man and reacts to another comment; gives no judgement of Klara and the Sun itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter calls Bicentennial Man the worst movie they've seen, but gives no verdict on Klara and the Sun itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment criticizes a different movie (Bicentennial Man) and offers no opinion on Klara and the Sun. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Criticizes Bicentennial Man, not this film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They criticize Bicentennial Man, not Klara and the Sun. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Commenter calls Bicentennial Man the worst movie they've ever seen, a clearly negative verdict on a different film, not Klara and the Sun; the comparison signals dislike of this film's kind, though it Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses a different movie (Bicentennial Man) rather than Klara and the Sun. | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | − | 0 |
| thread #38 w 0.16 I think even at Taika's peak of 10 years ago now, he would've still been a tonally at odds choice for this story. No real other unique critique that hasn't already been said that i can repeat here. Just listen to Michael Giacchino's beautiful score. and shout out Mia Tharia… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.128 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.94 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.91 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): mixed — Criticizes Taika's tonal suitability for the story, but praises the beautiful score and Mia Tharia's standout performance. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Calls the director a tonally wrong choice and echoes existing critiques; only the score and one performance get praise. Claude Sonnet 5.5: mixed — Criticizes Taika's tonally mismatched direction but praises Giacchino's score and Mia Tharia's performance; no clear overall lean. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — Criticizes the director as tonally mismatched and advises skipping the film to just listen to the score. Grok 4.7: mixed — Criticizes director's tonal mismatch but praises score and performance; no overall lean. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): mixed — Criticizes the film’s tonal fit while praising the score and Mia Tharia’s performance. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): mixed — VADER 0.128 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Criticizes the director choice as tonally at odds, suggesting the film wouldn't work. | + | + | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | − |
| thread #39 w 0.158 Interesting how we experienced it so differently. I thought she was the worst actor by far and really took me out of the movie as I was constantly noticing her acting VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.34 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.79 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Criticizes the acting as distracting and immersion-breaking, expressing a negative viewing experience. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Criticizes an actor's performance as the worst, saying it pulled them out of the movie. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Commenter says an actor was the worst and repeatedly pulled them out of the movie, a criticism of the film's execution affecting their experience. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter criticizes an actor's performance, stating it ruined their immersion in the movie. Grok 4.7: negative — Worst acting constantly broke immersion and took them out of the movie. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They criticize the acting and say it repeatedly took them out of the movie. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Commenter says the lead actor was the worst and constantly distracted them, implying they didn't enjoy the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter criticizes a major actor's performance, stating it negatively impacted their viewing experience. | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #40 w 0.156 Klara and the Sun is far too treacly and obvious to be taken seriously. I can see why this might work better in a book, but the sentimentality is piled on so high on film I just couldn’t get into it. I love a weepy or cute movie and for that I didn’t fully hate this, but I’m… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.06 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.69 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Overwhelmingly criticizes excessive sentimentality, shallow ideas, performances, and emotional dishonesty despite a few effective moments. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Calls it treacly, shallow, half-explored; minor praise for Adams and teary moments doesn't outweigh criticism. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Heavily critical: treacly, shallow, inane performances, broken emotional honesty. Brief concessions (Amy Adams, teared up) don't change the overall negative lean. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter criticizes the film's tone, performances, and shallow ideas, explicitly stating they couldn't get into it. Grok 4.7: negative — Extensive criticism of sentimentality, performances, and shallow ideas outweighs minor concessions. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — Despite a few emotional moments, they criticize the film as treacly, shallow, and emotionally dishonest, and say they couldn’t get into it. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — VADER 0.06 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter criticizes the film's sentimentality, direction, performances, and heavy-handed metaphors, despite minor tear-jerking moments. | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #41 w 0.154 That Simple Jack comparison is harsh but I see exactly what you mean about the performance choices. Something about making the robot naive to a cartoonish degree just kills the whole concept, Ishiguro's book works because Klara's intelligence is alien not impaired The party… VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.003 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.83 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Criticizes cartoonish performance choices and jarring tonal clashes, saying they undermined the concept and nearly prompted walking out. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Criticises the performance choices, the jarring tone, and nearly walking out; says Amy Adams deserved better. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Criticizes the performance choices, tone clash, and adaptation of Klara; says it nearly made them walk out and that Amy Adams deserved better. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — Criticizes the performance choices and jarring tone clash, stating it kills the concept and they almost walked out. Grok 4.7: negative — Criticizes cartoonish robot, jarring tone, nearly walked out; film failed the concept. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They criticize the performance, tone, and adaptation choices, saying the clash was jarring and they almost walked out. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — VADER 0.003 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter criticizes the performance choices, tone clashes, and states it 'kills the whole concept'. | 0 | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #42 w 0.152 Klara didn't even seem that alien in this either because she actually used pronouns/names instead of "The mother". I loved her performance from a physical comedy standpoint but do agree it was weird to show a robot capable of tutoring someone at a collegiate level in the books… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.625 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.96 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.83 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): mixed — Praises the physical comedy performance but criticizes Klara’s insufficiently alien characterization and inconsistent understanding. Claude Opus 5.5: mixed — Loved the physical comedy performance but criticises Klara seeming less alien and an inconsistent characterization. Claude Sonnet 5.5: mixed — Praises the lead performance but criticizes the adaptation's characterization of Klara and an inconsistency in her portrayal, with no clear overall lean. Gemini 4 Argon: mixed — Praises the physical comedy performance of Klara, but criticizes the inconsistent characterization compared to the book with no overall lean. Grok 4.7: mixed — Praises the performance but criticizes alien portrayal and inconsistent robot intelligence. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): mixed — They praise Klara’s physical comedy performance but criticize the film’s characterization as inconsistent with the books. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): mixed — VADER 0.625 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): mixed — Praises physical comedy and performance, but also criticizes a strange plot inconsistency. | + | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #43 w 0.151 Was the grass thing an addition or in the book because that was very, very stupid VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.609 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.94 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.81 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Calls an element of the film very stupid, expressing clear criticism. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Calls the grass scene 'very, very stupid', criticising the film's content with no offsetting praise. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Calls a specific plot element 'very, very stupid', a direct criticism of the film, though framed as a question about the book. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter criticizes a specific element in the film as 'very, very stupid' with no redeeming praise. Grok 4.7: negative — Calls a plot element in the film very stupid. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They call a film element “very, very stupid,” expressing criticism of the movie. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Calls a specific film element 'very, very stupid', a clear criticism of the movie's content. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter calls a specific element of the film adaptation 'very, very stupid'. | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #44 w 0.149 An addition. A very stupid addition. Klara wasn't that dumb in the books. She's more as portrayed as being naive for her near unwavering faith in the sun but never stupid. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.545 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.91 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.68 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Criticizes the film's added material for making Klara stupid, unlike her characterization in the book. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Criticizes the film's added portrayal of Klara as stupid, calling the change a very stupid addition. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Criticizes the film's portrayal of Klara as stupid, calling an addition 'very stupid' and unfaithful to the book characterization. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — Criticizes the film's adaptation choices, calling an addition 'very stupid' and lamenting how the main character was portrayed. Grok 4.7: negative — Calls a film addition stupid and criticizes the portrayal. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They criticize a film addition as stupid and say it mischaracterizes Klara compared with the book. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Calls the film's addition 'a very stupid addition' and criticizes its portrayal of Klara, a clear negative judgement of the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter calls an addition to the film 'very stupid' and criticizes how the character is portrayed. | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #45 w 0.147 Does Amy though? Like I love her but her last few films… sis… we need to talk or a new agent VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.519 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.72 P(pos)=0.02 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.70 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Criticizes Amy’s recent career choices without clearly judging this particular film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Comments on Amy Adams's recent film choices generally, not a judgement of this specific film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment is about an actress's recent film choices and career, not a judgment of Klara and the Sun itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Discusses the actress's recent career choices without expressing an opinion on this specific film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Skepticism about the actress’s recent films, not a judgment of this movie. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Criticizes Amy’s recent film choices generally, without judging Klara and the Sun itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment talks about the actress's other films and casting, not a judgement of Klara and the Sun itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Criticises the actor's recent film choices as poor. | + | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | − |
| thread #46 w 0.146 That party scene was absolutely abysmal VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.402 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.87 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Calls the party scene absolutely abysmal, expressing clear criticism of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Calls a scene 'absolutely abysmal', which most likely criticises the film's execution rather than the characters. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Calls a scene in the film 'absolutely abysmal', a direct criticism of the film's quality, with no balancing praise. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter strongly criticizes a specific scene in the movie as 'abysmal', expressing clear dissatisfaction. Grok 4.7: negative — Calls a scene absolutely abysmal, criticizing the film's quality. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — Calling a scene absolutely abysmal expresses clear criticism of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Calls the party scene 'absolutely abysmal', a clear criticism of that part of the film, with no offsetting praise. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter calls a scene 'absolutely abysmal', indicating a negative view of the film. | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #47 w 0.144 The scene with the gifted kids made a few people in my cinema leave. And I completely get them. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.052 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.96 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.55 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Expressing sympathy with viewers walking out implies the scene was off-putting enough to reject the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Sympathises with walkouts over one scene, but gives no clear judgement on the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Describes a disturbing scene and others walking out, but the commenter gives no clear overall judgment of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Ambiguous whether the scene was uncomfortably disturbing in an effective way or simply bad filmmaking. Grok 4.7: negative — Agrees walkouts were justified, criticizing the scene and film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They empathize with viewers leaving after a scene, implying it made the film unpleasant to watch. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Reports audience members walking out of a disturbing scene; the commenter sympathizes but gives no clear verdict on the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter describes the audience reaction and understands it, but expresses no personal verdict on the film. | − | + | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | − | − | 0 | 0 |
| thread #48 w 0.143 Im curious about a Review from someone that is not familiar with the book. Is the movie itself that bad? VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.296 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.97 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.66 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Asks whether the movie is bad without expressing their own judgment. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Asks for others' opinions about the movie; gives no judgement of their own. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — The commenter is asking for others' opinions and gives no verdict of their own on the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter has not seen the film and is asking others for a review. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Asks others if the movie is bad; no personal judgment. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They ask whether the movie is bad but offer no personal assessment of it. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Asks about the movie's quality without expressing their own judgement of the film; no clear verdict given. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Asking for reviews without expressing a personal opinion on the film. | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #49 w 0.141 Unfortunately I was not a fan. It feels very disjointed and somehow emotionally distant while being overly sentimental. I thought the human characters were just assholes (except the neighbor boy). You can feel the gaps of where long sections of prose were meant to fill in… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.853 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=1.00 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Explicitly not a fan; criticizes disjointed storytelling, emotional distance, excessive sentimentality, and comedy undermining emotional beats. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Explicitly not a fan; criticizes disjointed structure, emotional distance, unlikable characters, and undercutting comedy. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Commenter says they were not a fan, calling the film disjointed, emotionally distant, and undercut by weak comedy. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter explicitly states they were not a fan and criticizes the pacing, tone, and comedy. Grok 4.7: negative — Explicitly not a fan; calls the film disjointed, distant, and poorly comedic. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They explicitly say they were not a fan and criticize the film as disjointed, emotionally distant, and undermined by comedy. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Commenter says they were not a fan, criticizing disjointed pacing, distant emotion, and undercut beats. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter states they were 'not a fan' and criticizes the film's disjointed tone and comedy. | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #50 w 0.14 the human characters were just assholes Also true in the book VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.25 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.72 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.92 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Criticizes the human characters and compares them to the book, without judging the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Comments on characters being unpleasant, consistent with the book; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Describes human characters as assholes, noting it's true in the book too; a character observation, not a verdict on the film's quality. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment dislikes the characters in both the film and book, without judging the quality of the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Calls characters assholes; no judgement of the film itself. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They criticize the human characters as assholes, expressing a negative view of the film's characterization. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on characters being unpleasant and compares to the book; no judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Criticizes the characters and book rather than giving a verdict on the film itself. | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | 0 |
| thread #51 w 0.139 I've not read the book. It had a huge amount of whimsy, a pinch of gattaca and a big old heap of tearjerker. I liked it. I'm a 51 year old guy. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.625 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.69 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.68 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — The commenter explicitly says they liked the film, describing its whimsy and tearjerker elements. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Commenter explicitly says "I liked it," describing whimsy and tearjerker qualities approvingly. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter explicitly says 'I liked it' and describes it warmly as whimsical and a tearjerker, with no criticism. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states 'I liked it' and praises its whimsical and emotional qualities. Grok 4.7: positive — Explicitly says they liked the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — He explicitly says he liked the film, despite describing its style and emotional tone. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.625 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter explicitly states 'I liked it' and describes emotional and thematic elements positively. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #52 w 0.137 So I just saw it today, and as someone who hasn’t read the book, I mostly loved the movie. Granted I’m a bit of a mess right now mentally and so the emotional performances really hit me, but mostly I thought it was great. Based on some of the comments here, I can completely… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.986 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.92 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Mostly loved the movie, praising its visuals, pacing, and performances despite a light plot. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Mostly loved it, praising the visuals, pacing and performances; the only minor flaw noted is a light plot. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter mostly loved the film, praising visuals, pacing, and performances; only minor note that plot is light, and they're surprised by poor reception. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they mostly loved the movie, praising the visuals, pacing, and excellent main performances. Grok 4.7: positive — Mostly loved it and called it great despite a light plot. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They mostly loved it and call it great, praising its visuals, pacing, and performances despite noting a light plot. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter mostly loved the film, calling it great and beautiful, and is surprised by its poor reception. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter states they mostly loved the movie, thought it was great, and praises the performances and visual beauty. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #53 w 0.136 based purely off the trailers i thought it couldn’t be that bad but i was wrong. Jenna ortega puts in a very charming and great performance but that is quite literally the only redeeming factor VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.807 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.96 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Calls the film bad and Ortega’s performance its only redeeming factor. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Says the film was bad; praises Ortega's performance but calls it the only redeeming factor. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Says the film was worse than expected ('I was wrong') and that one performance is the only redeeming factor. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter states the film was worse than expected and only had one redeeming factor. Grok 4.7: negative — Expected it not to be bad, but only the lead performance redeemed it. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They say the film was worse than expected and that the performance was its only redeeming factor. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — VADER 0.807 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter states the film 'couldn't be that bad but i was wrong' and calls Jenna Ortega the only redeeming factor. | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #54 w 0.135 Ortega is quite good, and Lyonne is best fit for Waititi's comedic sensibilities, but the film is a complete miss otherwise. The screenplay is trying far too hard to be profound while constantly stopping to have the characters say exactly what they are feeling and why. I can… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.765 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.88 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Despite praising performances, they call the film a complete miss and criticize its screenplay and Waititi’s direction. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Praises two performances but calls the film a complete miss, criticizing the screenplay and Waititi's direction. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Praises a couple of performances but calls the film 'a complete miss otherwise,' criticizing the screenplay and Waititi's direction as a misfit. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — Despite praising the lead actors, the commenter calls the film a 'complete miss' and criticizes the screenplay and direction. Grok 4.7: negative — Calls the film a complete miss despite some acting praise. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — Despite praising two performances, the commenter calls the film a complete miss and criticizes its screenplay and directorial fit. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — VADER 0.765 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter calls the film a complete miss and criticizes the screenplay and direction. | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #55 w 0.134 All the reviews for this from actual attendees have been horrific. Guess I'm seeing Clayface at the weekend... VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.66 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.99 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Cites terrible attendee reviews and chooses another movie instead, indicating a negative recommendation. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter hasn't seen it; relays others' bad reviews and chooses another film instead. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Commenter relays that attendee reviews have been 'horrific' and chooses to see a different film instead, implying a negative view of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter has not seen the film and is deciding not to watch it based on others' reviews. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Hasn't seen it; cites others' reviews and skips it. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They cite overwhelmingly bad reviews and choose another movie instead, signaling they do not recommend this film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Commenter reports horrific reviews from attendees and chooses a different film instead, implying they won't see it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter notes the reviews are horrific and decides to see another movie instead. | − | − | − | − | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | − | − | − |
| thread #56 w 0.132 I’m a 36 year old guy. I read the book after getting a DUI. It was the first book I had read in years and as weird as this sounds, was part of helping me turn my life around. I was disappointed when I saw how bad the reviews were but I went and saw it with my wife anyway. It’s… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.964 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.89 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.70 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Despite flaws and adaptation changes, they defend the film as better than critics suggest. Claude Opus 5.5: mixed — Notes disjointedness and unfaithfulness, but says it's not as bad as critics claim; lukewarm, no clear lean. Claude Sonnet 5.5: mixed — Acknowledges flaws (disjointed, unfaithful to the book) but says it isn't as bad as critics claim; a mild lean positive but hedged. Gemini 4 Argon: mixed — Critiques it as disjointed and unfaithful, but notes it's not as bad as critics claim, without clear praise. Grok 4.7: positive — Notes flaws but defends the film as better than critics claim. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Despite noting flaws, they defend the film as better than its reviews suggest. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER -0.964 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): mixed — Acknowledges flaws and poor adaptation, but defends it against overly harsh critic reviews. | − | + | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | + | + | 0 |
| thread #57 w 0.131 The trailer made it look like it would be a decent movie. Derivative, but did not expect it to get obliterated like this lol VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.55 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.97 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.89 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Comments on trailer expectations and apparent critical reception, without judging the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Comments on the trailer and critical reception; gives no personal judgement of the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter discusses the trailer and the film's apparent poor reception, but hasn't stated their own verdict; seems not to have seen it. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter only discusses the trailer and critical reception, without giving their own verdict on the film. Grok 4.7: negative — Expected a decent film but calls it derivative and obliterated. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They expected a decent film from the trailer but call it derivative and say it was obliterated. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Says the film is derivative and was 'obliterated' compared to the trailer's promise, a clear critical judgement. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses the trailer and reception without expressing a personal verdict on the film itself. | + | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | − | − | − | 0 |
| thread #58 w 0.13 Almost everything from the trailer is from the first 15 minutes, which is the best section of the film VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.637 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.75 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.45 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Identifies the opening as the best section but gives no clear overall judgment or recommendation. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Calling the trailer-covered first 15 minutes the best part implies the rest of the film disappoints. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Says the first 15 minutes are the best part, implying the rest of the film is weaker and a letdown after the trailer. Gemini 4 Argon: mixed — Praises the first 15 minutes as the best part, implying the rest declines, without stating a clear overall verdict. Grok 4.7: negative — Implies the film peaks in the opening and declines afterward. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — Calling the opening the film’s best section implies the rest is weaker. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): mixed — Says the opening is the best section, implying the rest is weaker; overall lean is ambiguous and mildly negative but not clearly stated. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Implies the rest of the film is worse than the first 15 minutes. | + | − | 0 | 0 | − | − | 0 | − | − | 0 | − |
| thread #59 w 0.129 I liked this movie. It isn't movie of the year and yeah, no one should win an oscar for this movie, but I really loved Klara. She was honest and heartful in a world that lost all of that, someplace where you use eugenics to make the people smart, so the AI can be dumb. There… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.799 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.94 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.85 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Explicitly liked the movie and loved Klara, despite acknowledging flaws and giving a middling rating. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Says they liked it and loved Klara despite obvious problems; the 5/10 tempers it, but the lean is positive. Claude Sonnet 5.5: mixed — Says they liked it and loved Klara, but admits obvious problems, no awards merit, and gives 5/10; roughly balanced. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Explicitly states 'I liked this movie' and loved the main character despite acknowledging flaws and giving a 5/10. Grok 4.7: mixed — Liked it and loved Klara, but cites problems and rates 5/10. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): mixed — They loved Klara and liked the movie, but note obvious problems and give it a middling 5/10. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.799 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): mixed — Likes the character and says 'I liked this movie', but points out obvious problems and gives a 5/10 score. | + | + | 0 | + | + | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | + | 0 |
| thread #60 w 0.128 I have a free ticket to see a matinee of this next week, is this a "so bad the cost of your time alone is too high a price" film? VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.296 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.93 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — They haven't seen the film and are asking whether it is worth their time. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter hasn't seen the film yet and is only asking whether it's worth their time. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter hasn't seen the film; they're asking whether it's worth watching, giving no verdict of their own. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter has not seen the film yet and is asking others for their opinion. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Hasn't seen it; asking others if it's worth their time. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They ask whether the film is worth seeing but express no opinion of their own. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Commenter asks whether the film is worth their time but hasn't seen it or expressed a judgement yet. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter is asking if the film is bad before seeing it, offering no verdict. | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #61 w 0.127 People say Street Fighter was bad, and Reddit rated that a 6. The average here so far is a 7. I loved Street Fighter, but I didn’t read the book for this. I don’t really agree with the complaints here, because a lot of the plot points of the movie, was Ortega’s character doing… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.287 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=0.97 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.97 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Disputes complaints and discusses plot and ratings, but never clearly states liking or recommending the film. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Pushes back on complaints and defends the plot logic, implying they liked it, though no explicit praise. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter disagrees with the complaints, defends the plot, and expected a lower score, implying they view the film favorably, though not explicitly stated. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter defends the film's plot points and explicitly disagrees with the complaints in the thread. Grok 4.7: positive — Defends the film and rejects the thread’s complaints. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They disagree with complaints about the film, implicitly expressing a favorable view. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — VADER -0.287 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): mixed — Defends the movie against complaints and expected a lower score, but expresses mixed feelings about the adaptation. | − | + | 0 | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | − | 0 |
| thread #62 w 0.126 But did you read the book for Street Fighter? VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.226 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.02 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.50 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — A joke about reading a Street Fighter book, with no judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Joking question about reading a book for Street Fighter; no judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — A joke/sarcastic question about reading a book for Street Fighter; it gives no judgment of Klara and the Sun. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment is an unrelated joke and does not express an opinion on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Unrelated question about a Street Fighter book; no film judgment. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A question about reading a book; it gives no opinion on the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Asks about a different property (Street Fighter book); no judgement of Klara and the Sun expressed. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment asks a question about a different book and movie, unrelated to Klara and the Sun. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #63 w 0.125 You joke but there are a fuckton of Street Fighter comic books and manga. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.226 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.14 P(pos)=0.02 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.33 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Discusses Street Fighter comics and manga without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Off-topic reply about Street Fighter comics; no judgement of the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Joking aside about Street Fighter comics and manga; no judgement of Klara and the Sun. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Off-topic comment about Street Fighter comics, containing no mention or judgment of the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Off-topic remark about Street Fighter comics, no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — A factual aside about Street Fighter comics and manga, with no opinion on the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment is an off-topic joke about Street Fighter comics and manga, with no judgement of the film Klara and the Sun. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses comic books and manga, unrelated to the film's quality. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #64 w 0.124 Street Fighter was dope, and so was Klara. Both worth a watch VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.361 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.94 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.49 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Calls Klara dope and explicitly recommends watching it. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls Klara dope and worth a watch, a clear recommendation. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Calls Klara 'dope' and says both films are worth a watch, a clear positive recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states the movie was 'dope' and 'worth a watch'. Grok 4.7: positive — Calls Klara dope and worth watching. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They say Klara was dope and explicitly recommend it as worth a watch. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter calls the film 'dope' and says it's worth a watch, a clear recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter explicitly states the film is 'worth a watch' and 'dope'. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #65 w 0.123 Not that bad, just very childish, I would have enjoyed it more as a mum taking my 11yo kid to see it. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.566 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.71 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Calls it very childish and suggests enjoyment would depend on watching it with a child. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Faint praise ('not that bad') outweighed by criticism that it's too childish to enjoy as an adult. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — "Not that bad" is faint praise; the main criticism is that it's childish and the commenter didn't enjoy it as an adult viewer. Gemini 4 Argon: mixed — The commenter finds it 'not that bad' for kids, but too childish for their own enjoyment. Grok 4.7: negative — Soft disappointment: too childish, better suited to kids than them. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They found it too childish and imply they would have enjoyed it more as a parent watching with a child. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Commenter says it's 'not that bad' but 'very childish' and would have enjoyed it more as a parent with a kid, implying they didn't enjoy it themselves. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter found it very childish and implies they wouldn't have enjoyed it on their own. | + | − | − | − | − | − | 0 | − | − | − | − |
| thread #66 w 0.122 Is it worth watching? It looked fine in the trailer. How's the pacing for anyone that watched? VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.47 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.39 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — They haven't watched the film and are asking others whether it's worth watching and how the pacing is. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter hasn't seen the film; asks whether it's worth watching and about pacing. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — The commenter is asking whether the film is worth watching and hasn't seen it, so they give no verdict of their own. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter has not seen the film yet and is asking others for their opinions. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Asks if it's worth watching; hasn't seen the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter asks for opinions about watching it and its pacing, without giving their own verdict. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Asks whether the film is worth watching and about pacing, but expresses no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter is asking if the movie is worth watching and inquiring about the pacing, having not seen it yet. | + | + | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #67 w 0.121 I kinda felt that the movie felt like it dragged a little in the middle while simultaneously agreeing with others here saying that plot points were sometimes too quickly resolved. I enjoyed it but its definitely not winning awards There's a scene with these gifted children in… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.424 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.96 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Repeatedly says they enjoyed it despite pacing issues, tonal whiplash, and disagreement with critics about the ending. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Repeatedly says they enjoyed it despite pacing and tonal whiplash criticisms; leans positive overall. Claude Sonnet 5.5: mixed — Says they enjoyed it twice but lists pacing, rushed resolutions, and tonal whiplash; leans slightly positive but with substantial criticism. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter notes pacing issues and tonal whiplash, but explicitly repeats twice that they enjoyed the film overall. Grok 4.7: positive — Enjoyed it twice despite pacing, resolution, and tonal flaws. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They explicitly say they enjoyed it, despite pacing and tonal-whiplash flaws. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER 0.424 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): mixed — The user states they enjoyed the movie, but highlights significant flaws like dragging pacing, rushed plot points, and tonal whiplash. | + | + | 0 | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | 0 |
| thread #68 w 0.12 It was super hard to tell which one of them were AFs with how stiff the Lifted ones were in movement. I looked up the book, and it’s interesting no one here is talking about how . She sounded like a horrible mom in the book, but was fineish here. Not sure how much of a role the… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.393 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.03 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.40 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Discusses character portrayals, plot details, and book comparisons without judging the film overall. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Observations comparing film to book and characters; no clear judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comments on casting/performance observations and book comparisons without clearly stating whether they liked or recommend the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Discusses character movements and compares character traits to the book without expressing an overall verdict on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Book comparison and plot notes without judging the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): mixed — They criticize the stiff movement but say the mother was “fineish” in the film; overall opinion is balanced. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses casting/movement, compares to the book, and plot details without stating whether they liked the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter discusses book and movie details, character portrayals, and plot elements without giving an overall verdict on the film. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #69 w 0.12 The version of the movie in my head seems better, and my version unironically has Klara re-routing power like the T-800. The gut punch of the end of the book is a tough sell for film. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.599 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.56 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Says their imagined version seems better than the film, expressing disappointment with the adaptation. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Imagines their own version and speculates on adapting the book's ending; no clear judgement of the actual film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Says the version in their head seems better than the actual film, implying disappointment; the ending is a tough sell on film. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter finds the film inferior to their own imagined version and notes the book's ending translates poorly. Grok 4.7: negative — Prefers an imagined version, implying the film disappointed. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They say their imagined version of the movie seems better and doubt the book’s ending will work on film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Commenter prefers their imagined version over the film and calls the book's ending a tough sell, implying the film falls short. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter prefers their imaginary version and states the book's ending is a tough sell for film. | + | − | 0 | − | 0 | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #70 w 0.119 it simply can't be done "verbatim" on screen. I will probably see this on streaming just to see how he tackled the ending. VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.12 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.56 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — They discuss adaptation challenges and plan to watch later, without judging the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter hasn't seen it; discusses adaptation difficulty and plans to stream it later. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter hasn't seen the film yet; only comments on adaptation difficulty and intent to stream it, with no judgement of the film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter has not seen the movie yet and plans to watch it later on streaming. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Hasn't seen it; only plans to watch the ending. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They have not seen the film and only express curiosity about how it adapts the ending. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comments on adaptation difficulty and plans to watch later; no judgement of the film's quality yet. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses adaptation challenges and streaming plans without judging the film itself. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #71 w 0.118 The ending is probably the best part of the movie tbf. Not great, but still best part VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.805 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.98 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.58 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Calling even the movie’s best part “not great” implies an overall unfavorable assessment. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Calls the ending 'not great' yet the best part, implying the rest of the film is weaker. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Calls the ending the best part but explicitly 'not great'; implies the rest of the film is weaker, so overall lean is negative. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — Calling the best part of the movie 'not great' implies the rest of the film is even worse. Grok 4.7: negative — Even the best part isn't great, implying the film disappoints overall. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They call the movie not great, despite saying the ending is its best part. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Commenter says the ending is the best part but adds 'Not great', so the overall lean is disappointed. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): mixed — Calls the ending the best part but says it is 'not great'. | + | + | 0 | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | 0 |
| thread #72 w 0.117 I haven't read the book but I understood the closing scene to be Klara's pov, she's malfunctioning and we are seeing what she thinks is happening, not what actually is VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.17 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.85 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Interprets the closing scene without expressing an opinion on the film's quality. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Interpretation of the closing scene without any judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Interpretation of the closing scene with no judgment of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment only provides a plot interpretation and theory about the ending without judging the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Scene interpretation only; no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Offers an interpretation of the closing scene without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Offers an interpretation of the ending without any judgement of whether the film is good or recommended. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter discusses a plot interpretation without expressing any judgment or verdict on the film itself. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #73 w 0.116 Not as bad as some of the reviews made it out to be, it did have some problems with tone, but overall I enjoyed it VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.673 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.96 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.83 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Despite tonal problems, the commenter explicitly says they enjoyed it overall. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Notes tonal problems but says overall they enjoyed it, leaning positive. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Acknowledges tonal problems but concludes 'overall I enjoyed it' and defends it against harsher reviews, leaning positive. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they enjoyed the film overall despite some issues with tone. Grok 4.7: positive — Notes tone problems but overall enjoyed it despite flaws. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They acknowledge tonal problems but say they enjoyed the film overall. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Acknowledges some tonal problems but concludes overall they enjoyed the film, leaning clearly positive. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter acknowledges some tone issues but explicitly states they enjoyed the film overall. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #74 w 0.115 Most praising Ortega's acting here, but I think I preferred Mia Tharia's in places. Klara is a pretty one dimensional character played well, but ultimately there is not a lot of directions you can go with her. Ortega seemed to have some fun with it though. Mia is really let… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.992 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.99 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Despite decent performances, criticizes the story as emotionally lacking, unresolved, disjointed, and hamfisted. Claude Opus 5.5: mixed — Praises acting and finds a kernel of interest, but criticizes script, emotional weight, disjointed story; 6/10. Claude Sonnet 5.5: mixed — Criticizes script, emotional weight, and disjointed resolution, but acknowledges decent acting and a generous reading with interesting themes; 6/10 suggests no strong lean. Gemini 4 Argon: mixed — Gives a 6/10, praising the acting and core themes while criticizing the disjointed, hamfisted script and lack of emotional weight. Grok 4.7: negative — Expected emotional weight missing; calls story unresolved, disjointed, and lazily resolved despite some acting praise. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): mixed — They praise the performances and central idea, but criticize the story’s emotional weight, resolution, and execution; 6/10 reflects that mix. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): mixed — VADER 0.992 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): mixed — Criticises the script and lack of emotional weight, but gives a 6/10 rating and notes some decent elements. | + | − | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #75 w 0.115 Okay so it actually wasn’t as bad as I had feared…. Until the voice over ending. Idk I feel like this movie took the shallowest interpretation of the book and just kind of ran with it. Also the mom in the book bought the AF with the explicit purpose of having it be Josie and I… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.128 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.53 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Criticizes the voice-over ending, shallow interpretation of the book, and an unexplained adaptation change. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Faint relief undercut by criticism of the ending, a shallow adaptation, and confusing changes from the book. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Initially better than feared, but the ending and shallow adaptation of the book disappoint them; overall criticism dominates. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — Criticizes the ending and calls the film a shallow adaptation of the book with confusing plot changes. Grok 4.7: negative — Faint relief is undercut by criticism of the shallow adaptation, ending, and changes. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They criticize the ending and call the adaptation shallow, despite saying it initially wasn't as bad as feared. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — VADER -0.128 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter felt it was bad by the end and criticized its shallow interpretation. | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #76 w 0.114 The mom was skeptical of Klara in the book as well, but handled differently. I'm the book, Mother delays purchasing Klara for quite some time, leaving Klara in addition doubt. In the movie, she caves almost immediately and then is mean just to create conflict. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.565 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.47 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Criticizes the movie’s characterization of Mother as contrived conflict, contrasting it unfavorably with the book. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Criticizes the movie's handling of Mother as contrived, being mean 'just to create conflict' compared to the book. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Critiques the film's adaptation of the mother as rushed and manufactured for conflict, compared unfavorably to the book. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — Criticizes the movie's adaptation of the mother's character, saying her meanness exists 'just to create conflict'. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Book-vs-film plot comparison; criticizes one choice, no overall verdict. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They criticize the movie's handling of the mother as an artificial change that creates conflict. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Compares book and film characterization of the mother; no clear judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Criticizes the movie's handling of the mother's character for creating forced conflict. | − | − | 0 | − | − | − | − | 0 | − | 0 | − |
| thread #77 w 0.113 The last 30 minutes were awesome, I was holding back tears the whole time. Taika did a good job not undercutting the emotion with jokes at the end. It’s not a perfect movie, but there’s a lot of strong stuff in my opinion! VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.838 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.48 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Praises the emotional ending and strong material, explicitly expressing appreciation despite imperfections. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Praises emotional ending and direction; admits imperfection but overall leans clearly positive. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Praises the final act as awesome and emotional, credits the director, and admits imperfection but concludes there is a lot of strong stuff. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Praised the awesome ending, emotional impact, and strong elements despite not being a perfect movie. Grok 4.7: positive — Praises emotional ending and strong elements despite calling it imperfect. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Strong praise for the emotional ending and overall strengths outweighs the minor caveat that it is imperfect. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Praises the ending as awesome, emotionally moving, and says there's a lot of strong stuff, despite noting imperfections. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Praises the ending and overall strength of the film, despite acknowledging minor flaws. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #78 w 0.113 Just saw it with no expectations and it was entertaining without knowing anything about the book (always tricky to adapt a book). I wouldn’t say this is great and quite forgettable. Ortega was brilliant and I liked Adams. Tharia was the least likeable character and she didn’t… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.87 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.97 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.55 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): mixed — Found it entertaining and praised performances, but called it forgettable and criticized the central character relationship. Claude Opus 5.5: mixed — Entertaining with brilliant performances, but called not great and quite forgettable; no clear overall lean. Claude Sonnet 5.5: mixed — Says it was entertaining and praises Ortega and Adams, but calls it not great and quite forgettable, with no clear overall lean. Gemini 4 Argon: mixed — Found it entertaining with good performances, but called it 'not great and quite forgettable' with weak character dynamics. Grok 4.7: mixed — Found it entertaining, but not great and quite forgettable. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): mixed — Found it entertaining and praised the performances, but called it not great and forgettable. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): mixed — VADER 0.87 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): mixed — Entertaining and praised acting, but also called quite forgettable with flawed character bonds. | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #79 w 0.112 Yeah totally agree. Not sure why people are praising her acting, she was giving us school production acting and the character itself was not great. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.657 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.83 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Criticizes the acting as school-production quality and the character as poorly conceived, with no praise. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Criticizes the lead's acting as amateurish and the character as weak, agreeing with prior criticism. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Criticizes the acting as 'school production' level and the character as not great, disagreeing with praise; clear critical judgment of the film's execution. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter criticizes the acting as amateurish ('school production acting') and states the character writing was not great. Grok 4.7: negative — Criticizes the acting as amateurish and the character as poorly done. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — Criticizes the acting as amateurish and says the character was not great. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Commenter criticises the lead's acting and the character as poor, clearly disliking the film's performance. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter criticizes the acting as poor and the character as not great, indicating a negative view of the film. | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #80 w 0.111 I have not read the book and went on a whim this evening and genuinely loved it. I thought it was funny and sweet and sad. It reminded me of a funnier and gentler version of the 2001 film AI Artificial Intelligence, which was far more heartbreaking. Something also reminiscent… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.895 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.64 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.65 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — They genuinely loved the film, praising its humor, sweetness, and sadness while questioning the intense hate. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Commenter genuinely loved it, calling it funny, sweet and sad, and is puzzled by the hate. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter says they genuinely loved the film, calling it funny, sweet and sad, and is puzzled by the hate it receives. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states they "genuinely loved it" and describes it as funny, sweet, and sad. Grok 4.7: positive — Genuinely loved it; found it funny, sweet, and sad. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They genuinely loved the film, praising its humor and emotional qualities while expressing confusion about the hate. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter genuinely loved the film, found it funny, sweet and sad, and is puzzled by the hate it received. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter states they genuinely loved the movie and defends it against hate. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #81 w 0.11 Haven't seen the movie yet, but I believe a lot of the backlash is because the book it's adapting is neither funny nor gentle. Will still have to see it myself to be able to see where I fall, but that was the concern I had as well after seeing the trailer. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.274 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.57 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.48 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Hasn't seen the film; discusses adaptation concerns and reserves judgment until watching. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter hasn't seen the film; discusses backlash, the book, and trailer concerns without judging the film. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter hasn't seen the film and only speculates about the reasons for backlash, so they give no verdict of their own. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter explicitly states they have not seen the movie yet. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Has not seen the film; only discusses book and trailer concerns. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They haven't seen the movie and reserve judgment, only noting concerns about the book and trailer. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Commenter hasn't seen the film; they comment on backlash and the book's tone, with no judgement of this film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter has not seen the movie yet and expresses no verdict on it. | + | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #82 w 0.11 Waititi is a man of naughty badness and part of me is full of schadenfreude to see the last three films he's directed get clobbered. But part of me still loves him even though he's disappointed me. And I keep posting this all over the place, I know, but bear with me, I just… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.996 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.40 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.67 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Discusses Waititi’s career, collaborators, and past projects without judging Klara and the Sun. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses Waititi's career and collaborators generally; no judgement of Klara and the Sun itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment is about Taika Waititi's career and collaborators, not Klara and the Sun; no judgment of this film. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment discusses director Taika Waititi's career and collaborators without giving an opinion on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Discusses Waititi's career and collaborators, not this film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses Waititi’s career and recent films generally, without judging Klara and the Sun specifically. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses Waititi's collaborators and career credits; it never judges Klara and the Sun itself, though it mentions disappointment with his recent films generally. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses the director's career and creative partners without expressing a verdict on the specific film. | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #83 w 0.109 I thought this film was lovely and charming, but I'm not on the Taika Waititi hate wagon and I like movies about helpful/beneficial robots. Seems like people are hating on it mostly because it seems to advocate an idea about AI? But to me this is just pure science fiction, with… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.089 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.95 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.55 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Calls the film lovely and charming; subsequent plot interpretation does not undermine that clear praise. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Calls the film lovely and charming, defends it against critics, then shares an interpretation. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter calls the film lovely and charming, defends it against criticism, and enjoys its sci-fi take; the rest is interpretation. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly describes the film as lovely and charming and engages thoughtfully with its darker sci-fi elements. Grok 4.7: positive — Called the film lovely and charming and defended it against critics. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Calls the film lovely and charming; the darker interpretation and discussion of AI are not criticisms of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — VADER -0.089 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The user explicitly calls the film "lovely and charming" while discussing its plot and themes. | − | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #84 w 0.108 I like Taika (one of the few left apparently) and I'm tempted to go and see it despite all the hate it's getting. Is it his typical charm and humour? VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.883 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.61 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.89 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — They haven't seen the film and ask about its humour; liking Taika isn't a verdict on this film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter hasn't seen the film; likes the director and asks about its humour. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter hasn't seen the film; they're asking a question about it and expressing interest, with no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter states they are tempted to go see it, indicating they have not watched the film yet. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Has not seen the film; asks about director's style. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They haven't seen it and are asking whether it has Taika's usual charm and humour. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Commenter hasn't seen it; they're tempted to watch and ask about humour, expressing no judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter has not seen the film yet and is asking questions about its style. | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #85 w 0.108 Saw the premiere and even though I wasn't a big fan of Love and Thunder, it does hit his usual stuff and I liked Ortega's naive Klara. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.604 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.86 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.70 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Saw the premiere and praises Ortega's naive Klara; criticism concerns Love and Thunder, not this film. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Despite disliking the director's previous film, they say this delivers his usual strengths and praise Ortega's Klara. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter says the film hits the director's usual style and liked Ortega's naive Klara, with no real criticism of this film. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter liked Ortega's performance and felt the film positively reflected the director's usual style. Grok 4.7: positive — Liked Ortega's Klara and says the film hits the director's usual strengths. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They liked Ortega's portrayal of Klara and say the film delivers the director's usual strengths. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter says the film hits the director's usual stuff and they liked the lead performance, a favorable verdict on this film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter states they liked Ortega's performance and the film hits its usual stuff. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #86 w 0.107 Did I miss something? When does Josie die? I’ve seen 2 people say it now. Or is that part of it also your interpretation of what happened? Klara is completely unreliable after she loses her PEC-9, so anything could’ve happened. Do they actually make it clear Josie is dead and I… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.842 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.95 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Asks for clarification about Josie’s fate and Klara’s reliability without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Plot clarification question about Josie's fate; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — The commenter is asking a plot question about whether Josie dies and offers no judgement of the film's quality. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter is only discussing plot points and character interpretations without expressing an opinion on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot questions only; no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter asks for clarification about the plot and Klara’s reliability, without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Asks a plot question about whether Josie dies; no judgement of the film's quality or whether they'd recommend it. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Asking plot questions and discussing interpretation without giving an opinion on the film itself. | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #87 w 0.107 As someone who didn’t read the book, but did look up what happens, I don’t think they went for that ending here. The book made the retirement more of a junkyard and does a whole thing where , while this movie made it a retirement home. I would agree to the idea that VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.502 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.95 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.62 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Discusses differences between the book and film endings without evaluating the film’s quality. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Compares the movie's ending to the book's plot without judging the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Discusses differences between book and film endings without expressing a judgement of the film's quality; comment also cuts off. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Compares the plot ending to the book without expressing an opinion on the movie's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Compares book and film plot details without judging the movie. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses differences between the film and book ending without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Compares plot and ending to the book without expressing whether they liked or would recommend the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The comment discusses plot differences between the book and film adaptation without expressing a personal verdict. | + | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #88 w 0.106 Yeah, my interpretation of the movie’s ending was that Klara sees Josie as a hallucination, or at least sees some sort of past memory of her since her memory is so disjointed with the loss of the PEC-9. I’m happy with anyone having any interpretation they want, I was just… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.126 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.01 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.96 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Discusses interpretation of the ending without evaluating the film or expressing enjoyment or disappointment. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Shares an interpretation of the ending and asks about possible misunderstanding; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter discusses their interpretation of the ending and asks whether they misunderstood; no judgement of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The comment only discusses plot interpretation of the ending without expressing any judgment on the film's quality. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Ending interpretation and plot theory only; no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses an interpretation of the ending and asks about understanding, without judging the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — VADER -0.126 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter is discussing plot interpretations and asking questions without giving a judgement on the film. | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #89 w 0.105 This didn’t occur to me in the theater, but I can totally see your take, especially with the final scene. Oof, I do wonder if you’re right. VADER (old v1): neutral — VADER 0.0 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.13 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.61 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Responds to another viewer’s interpretation of the final scene without judging the film’s quality. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Responds to another user's interpretation; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Engages with another commenter's interpretation of the final scene without expressing any judgment of the film's quality or recommending it. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter discusses a theory about the film's plot without expressing whether they liked or disliked the movie. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Agrees with another's interpretation; no judgement of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They respond to another viewer’s interpretation of the final scene without judging the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — VADER 0.0 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Discusses a plot interpretation without expressing a personal verdict on the film. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #90 w 0.105 Is it so bad it's good? I love bad movies and like Ortega/Adams/Buscemi. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.22 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.64 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Asks whether the film is enjoyably bad and expresses cast preferences, without judging the film itself. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Asks a question about the film's quality; expresses no judgement of it and likely hasn't seen it. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — The commenter asks a question about whether the film is so bad it's good, without having given their own verdict on it. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter asks a question about the film's quality, indicating they haven't seen it yet. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Asks if it's so-bad-it's-good; no personal judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — Asks whether the movie is so bad it's good, but gives no verdict on the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Asks whether the film is so bad it's good; a question with no clear judgement of the film itself. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter has not seen the film and is asking about its quality. | + | + | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #91 w 0.104 you might like it, ortega is super charming and is easily the best part of the movie VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.95 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.98 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.52 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Suggests the viewer might enjoy it and praises Ortega as charming and the movie’s standout. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Tentatively recommends the film and praises Ortega as charming; no explicit criticism, only implied weaker elsewhere. Claude Sonnet 5.5: mixed — Praises Ortega as charming and the best part, but singling her out implies the rest is weaker; only a tentative 'might like it' recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — Recommends the film ('you might like it') and praises Ortega's performance as charming. Grok 4.7: positive — Soft recommendation; praises Ortega as the film's best part. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — Suggests the movie may appeal and praises Ortega as its best part. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter recommends the film ('you might like it') and praises the lead actor as charming and the best part. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — Recommends the film and praises Ortega as super charming and the best part. | + | + | 0 | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #92 w 0.104 I wouldn't say 'so bad it's good' but more 'It's so mid that it is actually ok'. I don't feel the hate train others have for it to call any aspect bad, but it never rises in any aspect to be 'good' either. Perfectly fine. I don't regret my time with it, but I'll likely forget… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.884 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.63 P(pos)=0.03 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.50 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Calls it mediocre and forgettable, with no aspect good, despite finding it watchable and not regretting the time. Claude Opus 5.5: mixed — Calls it mid and perfectly fine: not bad, never good, forgettable but not regretted. No clear lean. Claude Sonnet 5.5: mixed — Calls it mid and forgettable but 'perfectly fine' with no regrets; no aspect bad or good, so no clear lean. Gemini 4 Argon: mixed — The commenter explicitly rates the film as 'mid', 'ok', and 'perfectly fine'—neither bad nor good. Grok 4.7: negative — Calls it mid, not good, and forgettable despite not hating it. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): mixed — They found it acceptable and not regrettable, but also mediocre and forgettable. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): mixed — VADER 0.884 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): mixed — Describes the film as 'mid' and 'ok', neither hating nor praising it, resulting in a mixed stance. | + | − | − | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #93 w 0.103 Same feelings I have. I thought some of the jokes were unnecessary but it was a good enough film to watch. I liked it and the visuals were nice and bright. It has its fault and characters are a bit underdeveloped but it still tries to convey the main theme of the book. Found… VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.947 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=1.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.94 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): positive — Explicitly liked the film and praised its visuals despite unnecessary jokes and underdeveloped characters. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Notes flaws like unnecessary jokes and underdeveloped characters, but explicitly liked it overall. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Says they liked it and it was good enough, with nice visuals; flaws noted (underdeveloped characters, unnecessary jokes) but overall leans favorable. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter explicitly states 'I liked it' and 'good enough film to watch', leaning positive despite noting minor flaws. Grok 4.7: positive — Explicitly liked it despite unnecessary jokes and underdeveloped characters. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): positive — They liked the film and its visuals despite some flaws, and found the second half stronger. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Says it was a good enough film, they liked it, visuals nice, second half stronger despite flaws. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): positive — The commenter explicitly states 'I liked it' and calls it 'a good enough film'. | + | + | 0 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| thread #94 w 0.103 It's regular bad. Ortega gives 100% and Adams gets a thankless sad mom role. Only saw it because Amy Adams was in it. VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.765 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): negative — NLI p=0.99 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Calls the film bad despite praising Ortega’s effort and watching for Amy Adams. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Calls the film 'regular bad'; praise of Ortega's effort doesn't outweigh the overall negative judgment. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Calls the film "regular bad" and notes a thankless role; only mild praise for Ortega's effort doesn't offset the overall negative verdict. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — The commenter explicitly calls the movie "regular bad" despite praising Ortega's effort. Grok 4.7: negative — Explicitly calls the film regular bad despite actor praise. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — Calls the movie bad, while noting Ortega’s effort and Adams’s role. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — Calls the film 'regular bad' and says they only watched it for Amy Adams; overall dislike despite praising Ortega's performance. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — The commenter calls the movie 'regular bad' and watched it only for an actor. | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #95 w 0.102 It’s just fine. To me it’s a kids movie through and through. Can’t imagine my 34yo male partner watching it and taking it seriously. And he’s read and liked the book VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.44 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=0.01 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.38 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Lukewarm assessment dismisses the film as a kids movie adults would struggle to take seriously. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Lukewarm 'just fine' and dismisses it as a kids movie that adults won't take seriously. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Calls it 'just fine' and dismisses it as a kids movie not to be taken seriously, implying lukewarm-to-negative view and no recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — Expresses lukewarm disappointment, dismissing it as 'just fine' and overly childish compared to the book. Grok 4.7: negative — Calls it just fine and a kids movie adults wouldn't take seriously. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — Calling it “just fine” and dismissing it as a kids movie signals a lukewarm, critical verdict. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): negative — VADER 0.44 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Describes the film as 'just fine' and a 'kids movie' that an adult cannot take seriously. | + | − | 0 | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| thread #96 w 0.102 Jenna Ortega was very good here. Everything else, not so much. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.493 siebert+opinion (previous live): negative — P(op)=0.99 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.77 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): negative — Praises Jenna Ortega’s performance but dismisses the rest of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: negative — Praises one actor's performance but dismisses everything else in the film; overall lean is negative. Claude Sonnet 5.5: negative — Praises only Jenna Ortega's performance and says everything else was not good, so the overall verdict on the film is negative. Gemini 4 Argon: negative — Praised one actress's performance, but disliked the rest of the film. Grok 4.7: negative — Praises one performance but dismisses everything else about the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): negative — They praise Jenna Ortega’s performance but dismiss everything else, indicating an overall negative view of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): mixed — Praises Jenna Ortega's performance but says everything else was not good; clear praise and criticism with no overall lean. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): negative — Praises one aspect but states 'everything else, not so much', leading to an overall negative verdict. | + | − | 0 | − | − | − | − | − | − | 0 | − |
| thread #97 w 0.101 I like it better as an actual retirement home, and the idea that there was actually a happyish ending, rather than her not understanding what black gowns are. VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.66 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=1.00 P(pos)=0.98 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.65 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Expresses a preference for one interpretation of the ending, not an overall judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Prefers one interpretation of the ending over another; no judgement of the film's quality. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Comment discusses preferred interpretation of the ending (retirement home vs. Klara's misunderstanding) without clearly judging the film's overall quality. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — Discusses an interpretation of a plot point/ending without giving an overall verdict on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Prefers one ending interpretation over another; no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They prefer a particular interpretation of the ending, but don’t judge the film itself. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses plot interpretation and an ending idea without clearly judging whether the film itself is good or worth recommending. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter is discussing alternative plot interpretations rather than reviewing the film itself. | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #98 w 0.101 Can anyone describe the ending of this movie to me in detail? I had a vivid dream of the ending and I can't find the actual ending anywhere, I'm so scared that what I dreamed is actually what it ended like because I was watching a video about the movie and the book, and I can't… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.277 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.01 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.83 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Asks for ending details and describes a dream without judging the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Asks about the ending after a dream; no judgement of the film itself. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — The commenter asks about the movie's ending and describes a dream, without giving any judgment of the film itself. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter asks for the plot of the ending and has not expressed an opinion on the film itself. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Asks for the ending; no judgment of the film. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They ask for an ending description and express fear about a dream, but give no judgment of the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Asks about the ending and a lost video; expresses confusion, no judgement of the film's quality. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter is asking for the ending of the movie based on a dream and has not expressed an opinion on the film itself. | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| thread #99 w 0.1 Nevermind lol. Just realized I can't find anything about the ending because the ending I am looking for clues about definitely did not ever exist. It was all dream. Haha VADER (old v1): positive — VADER 0.859 siebert+opinion (previous live): neutral — P(op)=0.03 P(pos)=0.00 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): no_verdict — NLI p=0.64 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Discusses confusion about an ending without expressing a judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: no_verdict — Joke about misremembering an ending; no judgement of the film expressed. Claude Sonnet 5.5: no_verdict — Commenter jokes about searching for clues on an ending they imagined; no judgment of the film's quality or recommendation. Gemini 4 Argon: no_verdict — The commenter makes a joke about imagining an ending and offers no opinion on the film. Grok 4.7: no_verdict — Plot realization about a dream ending; no film judgement. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They discuss confusion about the ending but express no opinion on the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): no_verdict — Commenter discusses their own interpretation of the ending and a dream plot point; no judgement of the film's quality is expressed. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — Comment discusses confusion over the plot and ending without giving a verdict on the film. | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| other-sub #0 w 0.5 I watched the movie a couple of hours ago and I can't stop thinking about it. I think I might be going crazy because critics seem to gloss over the most important thing about it, which is religion. I haven't read the book, so I don't really care about inconsistencies. Religion… VADER (old v1): negative — VADER -0.897 siebert+opinion (previous live): positive — P(op)=0.54 P(pos)=0.99 Local NLI stance (deberta-v3-large): mixed — NLI p=0.67 GPT-6.1 Sol (LIVE): no_verdict — Analyzes religious symbolism and challenges critics’ interpretations without expressing an overall judgment of the film. Claude Opus 5.5: positive — Can't stop thinking about it, defends the film against critics, and engages deeply and admiringly with its themes. Claude Sonnet 5.5: positive — Commenter can't stop thinking about the film, defends its religious themes against critics, and finds rich symbolism, implying a strongly favorable view. Gemini 4 Argon: positive — The commenter can't stop thinking about the movie and defends its religious themes against critics who called them stupid. Grok 4.7: positive — Deeply affected and defends the film’s religious themes as meaningful against critics. GPT-6 Luna (cheap): no_verdict — They analyze the film’s religious symbolism but do not clearly say whether they liked or recommend the film. Claude Haiku 5.5 (cheap): positive — Commenter finds the film deeply meaningful, praising its religious themes and symbolism, and clearly engaged and impressed; no criticism of the film. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (cheap): no_verdict — The commenter discusses religious themes, symbolism, and book differences without expressing a clear verdict on the film's quality. | − | + | 0 | 0 | + | + | + | + | 0 | + | 0 |